TY - JOUR
T1 - The Process and Product of Coherence Monitoring in Young Readers
T2 - Effects of Reader and Text Characteristics
AU - Currie, Nicola K.
AU - Francey, Gillian
AU - Davies, Robert
AU - Gray, Shelley
AU - Bridges, Mindy S.
AU - Restrepo, Maria Adelaida
AU - Thompson, Marilyn S.
AU - Ciraolo, Margeaux F.
AU - Hu, Jinxiang
AU - Cain, Kate
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Grant R01HD093003 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - We examined sixth graders’ detection of inconsistencies in narrative and expository passages, contrasting participants who were monolingual speakers (N = 85) or Spanish-English DLLs (N = 94) when recruited in pre-kindergarten (PK). We recorded self-paced reading times and judgments about whether the text made sense, and took an independent measure of word reading. Main findings were that inconsistency detection was better for narratives, for participants who were monolingual speakers in PK, and for those who were better word readers. When the text processing demands were increased by separating the inconsistent sentence and its premise with filler sentences there was a stronger signal for inconsistency detection during reading for better word readers. Reading patterns differed for texts for which children reported an inconsistency compared to those for which they did not, indicating a failure to adequately monitor for coherence while reading. Our performance measures indicate that narrative and expository texts make different demands on readers.
AB - We examined sixth graders’ detection of inconsistencies in narrative and expository passages, contrasting participants who were monolingual speakers (N = 85) or Spanish-English DLLs (N = 94) when recruited in pre-kindergarten (PK). We recorded self-paced reading times and judgments about whether the text made sense, and took an independent measure of word reading. Main findings were that inconsistency detection was better for narratives, for participants who were monolingual speakers in PK, and for those who were better word readers. When the text processing demands were increased by separating the inconsistent sentence and its premise with filler sentences there was a stronger signal for inconsistency detection during reading for better word readers. Reading patterns differed for texts for which children reported an inconsistency compared to those for which they did not, indicating a failure to adequately monitor for coherence while reading. Our performance measures indicate that narrative and expository texts make different demands on readers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092893801&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092893801&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503
DO - 10.1080/10888438.2020.1831503
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85092893801
SN - 1088-8438
VL - 25
SP - 141
EP - 158
JO - Scientific Studies of Reading
JF - Scientific Studies of Reading
IS - 2
ER -