The public value of nanotechnology?

Erik Fisher, Catherine P. Slade, Derrick Anderson, Barry Bozeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations


Science and innovation policy (SIP) is typically justified in terms of public values while SIP program assessments are typically limited to economic terms that imperfectly take into account these values. The study of public values through public value mapping (PVM) lacks widely-accepted methods for systematically identifying value structures within SIP and its public policy processes, especially when there are multiple stakeholder groups. This paper advances the study of public values in SIP using nanoscale science and engineering (NSE) policy by demonstrating that quantitative analysis of value statements can provide a credible and robust basis for policy analysis. We use content analysis of over 1,000 documents with over 100,000 pages from major contributors to the NSE policy discourse to identify and analyze a wide range of public value statements. Data analysis and reduction methods reveal a multifactor structure of public values that has been consistently cited by a range of actors in an NSE research policy network.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-39
Number of pages11
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2010


  • Nanotechnology
  • Public policy analysis
  • Public values
  • Science and technology policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Library and Information Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'The public value of nanotechnology?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this