Reconceptualizing Individual Differences in Self-Enhancement Bias: An Interpersonal Approach

Virginia S.Y. Kwan, David A. Kenny, Oliver P. John, Michael H. Bond, Richard W. Robins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

223 Scopus citations

Abstract

Self-enhancement bias has been studied from 2 perspectives: L. Festinger's (1954) social comparison theory (self-enhancers perceive themselves more positively than they perceive others) and G. W. Allport's (1937) self-insight theory (self-enhancers perceive themselves more positively than they are perceived by others). These 2 perspectives are theoretically and empirically distinct, and the failure to recognize their differences has led to a protracted debate. A new interpersonal approach to self-enhancement decomposes self-perception into 3 components: perceiver effect, target effect, and unique self-perception. Both theoretical derivations and an illustrative study suggest that this resulting measure of self-enhancement is less confounded by unwanted components of interpersonal perception than previous social comparison and self-insight measures. Findings help reconcile conflicting views about whether self-enhancement is adaptive or maladaptive.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-110
Number of pages17
JournalPsychological review
Volume111
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconceptualizing Individual Differences in Self-Enhancement Bias: An Interpersonal Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this