TY - JOUR
T1 - Zoning and diversity in historical perspective
AU - Talen, Emily
N1 - Funding Information:
The author disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Funding for this paper was generously provided by the National Endowment for the Arts, and the National Science Foundation under Grant No. DEB-0423704, CAP LTER.
PY - 2012/11
Y1 - 2012/11
N2 - The notion of urban diversity is a key component of successful urbanism. It is ironic that the rules of citymaking-in particular, zoning-came to be associated with the near antithesis of diversity. Instead of promoting the mixing of people and uses, zoning produced just the opposite. While the history of zoning and its negative effects on urban diversity are widely known, the history of this association is more complex than is generally reported. This article sheds light on the connection between zoning and diversity from a new, historically informed perspective. The author contends that, although zoning was used for exclusionary purposes, the original thinking about zoning was often more nuanced with regard to diversity and mix than most critics of zoning allow. The author presents an historical review of what the original framers of zoning thought about the mixing of people and land uses in cities, and what their motivations were. The author concludes with an assessment of current zoning reform efforts in light of this history.
AB - The notion of urban diversity is a key component of successful urbanism. It is ironic that the rules of citymaking-in particular, zoning-came to be associated with the near antithesis of diversity. Instead of promoting the mixing of people and uses, zoning produced just the opposite. While the history of zoning and its negative effects on urban diversity are widely known, the history of this association is more complex than is generally reported. This article sheds light on the connection between zoning and diversity from a new, historically informed perspective. The author contends that, although zoning was used for exclusionary purposes, the original thinking about zoning was often more nuanced with regard to diversity and mix than most critics of zoning allow. The author presents an historical review of what the original framers of zoning thought about the mixing of people and land uses in cities, and what their motivations were. The author concludes with an assessment of current zoning reform efforts in light of this history.
KW - Codes
KW - Diversity
KW - Zoning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867166069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867166069&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1538513212444566
DO - 10.1177/1538513212444566
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84867166069
SN - 1538-5132
VL - 11
SP - 330
EP - 347
JO - Journal of Planning History
JF - Journal of Planning History
IS - 4
ER -