TY - JOUR
T1 - Writing skills, knowledge, motivation, and strategic behavior predict students’ persuasive writing performance in the context of robust writing instruction
AU - Graham, Stephen
AU - Wijekumar, Kausalai
AU - Harris, Karen
AU - Lei, Pui Wa
AU - Fishman, Evan
AU - Ray, Amber B.
AU - Houston, Julia
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through grant R305A1300705 to Texas A&M University. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education. Steve Graham is the Emily Warner Professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University; Kausalai Wijekumar is the Houston Endowment Chair at Texas A&M University; Karen R. Harris is the Emily Warner Professor in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University; Pui-Wa Lei is a professor in the Department of Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education at the Pennsylvania State University; Evan Fishman is a user experience researcher in the San Francisco Bay Area; Amber B. Ray is an assistant professor in special education at the University of Hawaii at Manoa; Julia Houston is a doctoral student in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. Correspondence may be sent to Steve Graham at [email protected].
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - This study tested whether writing skills, knowledge, motivation, and strategic behaviors (within the context of robust writing instruction) each made a statistically unique contribution to predicting fifth-grade students’ (123 girls, 104 boys) composition quality and length on a persuasive writing task involving source material, after variance due to other predictors and control variables (reading comprehension, gender, class, and school effects) were controlled. With one exception, writing skills, knowledge, motivation, and strategic behaviors each accounted for statistically unique variance in predicting compositional quality. The exception involved writing knowledge, which did not make a unique contribution in the fall but did in the spring, when a topic knowledge measure was added. In addition, writing motivation, and strategic behaviors accounted for unique variance in composition length in the fall, and writing knowledge did so in the spring.
AB - This study tested whether writing skills, knowledge, motivation, and strategic behaviors (within the context of robust writing instruction) each made a statistically unique contribution to predicting fifth-grade students’ (123 girls, 104 boys) composition quality and length on a persuasive writing task involving source material, after variance due to other predictors and control variables (reading comprehension, gender, class, and school effects) were controlled. With one exception, writing skills, knowledge, motivation, and strategic behaviors each accounted for statistically unique variance in predicting compositional quality. The exception involved writing knowledge, which did not make a unique contribution in the fall but did in the spring, when a topic knowledge measure was added. In addition, writing motivation, and strategic behaviors accounted for unique variance in composition length in the fall, and writing knowledge did so in the spring.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061318244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061318244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/701720
DO - 10.1086/701720
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061318244
SN - 0013-5984
VL - 119
SP - 487
EP - 510
JO - Elementary School Journal
JF - Elementary School Journal
IS - 3
ER -