TY - JOUR
T1 - Work in Progress
T2 - 2023 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition - The Harbor of Engineering: Education for 130 Years, ASEE 2023
AU - Jenkins, Cody
AU - Ta, Thien
AU - Milcarek, Ryan J.
AU - Lichtenstein, Gary
AU - Brunhaver, Samantha R.
AU - Smith, Karl A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This material is also based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2205001.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2023.
PY - 2023/6/25
Y1 - 2023/6/25
N2 - The PEERSIST (Peer-led, Student Instructed STudy group) model promotes academic achievement through peer dialogue, in which disciplinary knowledge is socially co-constructed and refined over successive sessions. The study presents and utilizes an observation protocol to evaluate the implementation of peer learning in a mezzanine-level thermodynamics course at a large southwestern public university. The observation protocol was used to measure and compare the student interactions in two types of recitation sections, one of which used Peer-Led Study Groups (PLSGs) and the other of which followed a traditional TA-led format, to help demonstrate that student interactions were the main source of learning in the PLSG sections. The results showed that student interactions occurred at a significantly higher rate in the PLSG sections than in the TA-led sections. The study also analyzed peer interactions by incoming course preparedness in the PLSG sections and found a non-significant relationship between each group's mean pre-course grade point average (GPA) and number of peer interactions.
AB - The PEERSIST (Peer-led, Student Instructed STudy group) model promotes academic achievement through peer dialogue, in which disciplinary knowledge is socially co-constructed and refined over successive sessions. The study presents and utilizes an observation protocol to evaluate the implementation of peer learning in a mezzanine-level thermodynamics course at a large southwestern public university. The observation protocol was used to measure and compare the student interactions in two types of recitation sections, one of which used Peer-Led Study Groups (PLSGs) and the other of which followed a traditional TA-led format, to help demonstrate that student interactions were the main source of learning in the PLSG sections. The results showed that student interactions occurred at a significantly higher rate in the PLSG sections than in the TA-led sections. The study also analyzed peer interactions by incoming course preparedness in the PLSG sections and found a non-significant relationship between each group's mean pre-course grade point average (GPA) and number of peer interactions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85172069919&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85172069919&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85172069919
SN - 2153-5965
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Y2 - 25 June 2023 through 28 June 2023
ER -