TY - JOUR
T1 - Who refers parents with intellectual disabilities to the child welfare system? An analysis of referral sources and substantiation
AU - DeZelar, Sharyn
AU - Lightfoot, Elizabeth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Parents with intellectual disabilities (ID) have higher rates of child welfare involvement than their non-disabled peers. One common explanation for the high rates of child welfare involvement is that they are more likely to be referred to child protection because of their substantial, ongoing involvement with professionals who are mandated reporters. Professionals are the largest overall source of child protection referrals in the United States, however prior to this study, there has not been any exploration into referral sources in cases specifically involving parents with ID in the United States. This study explored report sources to child welfare using the 2014 National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System data, comparing parents with ID, parents with other disabilities, and parents with no disabilities. Secondary data analysis showed that parents with ID and parents with other disabilities had higher odds of referral by social services personnel than parents without disabilities. Additionally, among cases that entered the system from both professional and non-professional report sources, caregivers with an ID had higher odds of case substantiation than those whose caregiver did not have an ID. Implications for practice, policy and future research are discussed.
AB - Parents with intellectual disabilities (ID) have higher rates of child welfare involvement than their non-disabled peers. One common explanation for the high rates of child welfare involvement is that they are more likely to be referred to child protection because of their substantial, ongoing involvement with professionals who are mandated reporters. Professionals are the largest overall source of child protection referrals in the United States, however prior to this study, there has not been any exploration into referral sources in cases specifically involving parents with ID in the United States. This study explored report sources to child welfare using the 2014 National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System data, comparing parents with ID, parents with other disabilities, and parents with no disabilities. Secondary data analysis showed that parents with ID and parents with other disabilities had higher odds of referral by social services personnel than parents without disabilities. Additionally, among cases that entered the system from both professional and non-professional report sources, caregivers with an ID had higher odds of case substantiation than those whose caregiver did not have an ID. Implications for practice, policy and future research are discussed.
KW - Child welfare
KW - Disabilities
KW - Exposure bias
KW - Intellectual disabilities
KW - Reporting
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095413330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85095413330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105639
DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105639
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85095413330
SN - 0190-7409
VL - 119
JO - Children and Youth Services Review
JF - Children and Youth Services Review
M1 - 105639
ER -