Who are the eligible non-recipients of child care subsidies?

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Scopus citations


    Given the highly devolved nature of the U.S. child care subsidy system, recent studies have devoted considerable attention to exploring family-level correlates of subsidy receipt. However, most studies in this literature are limited in two respects. First, by focusing exclusively on the characteristics of recipients, previous research has neglected a group with important policy implications: eligible non-recipients of child care subsidies. Second, previous work compares recipient households to a heterogeneous population of non-recipients, many of whom are ineligible for child care assistance. This paper provides the first detailed examination of eligible non-recipients of child care subsidies, and uses this group to make more appropriate comparisons to those receiving benefits. Using data from the 2002 National Survey of America's Families, I begin by simulating states' eligibility rules for 2001. Although many of the differences between recipients and non-recipients disappear when the analysis is limited to eligible households, a number of key differences persist. With eligibility status serving as a de facto control for financial need and preferences for work, I argue that many of the remaining differences between recipients and non-recipients are due to rationing by states, low parental awareness of benefits, and difficulties navigating the subsidy system.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1037-1054
    Number of pages18
    JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
    Issue number9
    StatePublished - Sep 2008


    • Child care subsidies
    • Eligibility
    • Welfare reform
    • Work supports

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Education
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology
    • Sociology and Political Science


    Dive into the research topics of 'Who are the eligible non-recipients of child care subsidies?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this