Whistleblowers and Outcomes of Financial Misrepresentation Enforcement Actions

Andrew C. Call, Gerald S. Martin, Nathan Y. Sharp, Jaron H. Wilde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

70 Scopus citations

Abstract

Whistleblowers are ostensibly a valuable resource to regulators investigating securities violations, but whether there is a link between whistleblower involvement and the outcomes of enforcement actions is unclear. Using a data set of employee whistleblowing allegations obtained from the U.S. government and the universe of enforcement actions for financial misrepresentation, we find that whistleblower involvement is associated with higher monetary penalties for targeted firms and employees and with longer prison sentences for culpable executives. We also find that regulators more quickly begin enforcement proceedings when whistleblowers are involved. Our findings suggest that whistleblowers are a valuable source of information for regulators who investigate and prosecute financial misrepresentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-171
Number of pages49
JournalJournal of Accounting Research
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2018

Keywords

  • G38
  • K22
  • K42
  • M40
  • M41
  • M48
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
  • enforcement actions
  • financial reporting
  • fraud
  • penalties
  • whistleblowers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Accounting
  • Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whistleblowers and Outcomes of Financial Misrepresentation Enforcement Actions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this