TY - JOUR
T1 - What's the Deal with Revlon?
AU - Gubler, Zachary
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Trustees of Indiana University. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Under the Revlon doctrine, courts are to apply a higher level of scrutiny in certain takeover situations in an attempt to control potential conflicts of interest that might prejudice target shareholders. However, the doctrine has always had sufficient "play in the joints" that one might reasonably wonder whether it has much of an effect in practice on short-term shareholder returns. Additionally, in recent years, the trend in Delaware's Revlon jurisprudence seems to be to defer to the target board as long as there are no glaring conflicts of interest. Taken together, these facts raise concern over the continued relevance of the Revlon doctrine. It turns out this concern is justified. In this Article, I present evidence that Revlon has a significant effect on the type of sales process that target boards adopt-when in Revlon mode, they pursue active market checks with greater frequency, engage with more potential bidders and receive more bids. However, this difference in process has no discernible effect on shareholder returns, whether measured as abnormal market returns upon deal announcement or deal premia. And yet, there is still evidence, in this study and others, that conflicts of interest abound.
AB - Under the Revlon doctrine, courts are to apply a higher level of scrutiny in certain takeover situations in an attempt to control potential conflicts of interest that might prejudice target shareholders. However, the doctrine has always had sufficient "play in the joints" that one might reasonably wonder whether it has much of an effect in practice on short-term shareholder returns. Additionally, in recent years, the trend in Delaware's Revlon jurisprudence seems to be to defer to the target board as long as there are no glaring conflicts of interest. Taken together, these facts raise concern over the continued relevance of the Revlon doctrine. It turns out this concern is justified. In this Article, I present evidence that Revlon has a significant effect on the type of sales process that target boards adopt-when in Revlon mode, they pursue active market checks with greater frequency, engage with more potential bidders and receive more bids. However, this difference in process has no discernible effect on shareholder returns, whether measured as abnormal market returns upon deal announcement or deal premia. And yet, there is still evidence, in this study and others, that conflicts of interest abound.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126872150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126872150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85126872150
SN - 0019-6665
VL - 96
SP - 429
EP - 469
JO - Indiana Law Journal
JF - Indiana Law Journal
IS - 2
ER -