TY - GEN
T1 - Upstream Digitized Materials Tracking by Vendors and Suppliers-Barriers, Drivers, and Benefits
AU - Schneider, Verena
AU - Grau, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 ASCE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Materials tracking by means of auto-identification technologies has been limited to the semi-Automation of onsite materials management. Thus, an opportunity to leverage the use of identification and information technologies by materials vendors and suppliers, i.e., upstream materials tracking, is yet to be explored. In response, this study aims at characterizing the unexplored facet of upstream tracking by vendors and suppliers and explaining its barriers and drivers. A survey instrument was designed to determine the current state of materials tracking readiness, digitization barriers, and opportunities. In total, 50 survey responses were obtained. In addition, remarkable case studies on upstream tracking were characterized through the qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with a pre-qualified sample of 13 subject matter experts. Drivers, benefits, and barriers associated with upstream tracking were identified and characterized. For example, a lack of clear return on investment stands a prevailing barrier against the adoption of upstream tracking at every key stakeholder organization, i.e., owners, contractors, and vendors/suppliers. In addition, a disassociation between the fabrication or manufacturing information status of a material component and the physical tracking of such component was characterized as a fundamental difference from onsite tracking practices.
AB - Materials tracking by means of auto-identification technologies has been limited to the semi-Automation of onsite materials management. Thus, an opportunity to leverage the use of identification and information technologies by materials vendors and suppliers, i.e., upstream materials tracking, is yet to be explored. In response, this study aims at characterizing the unexplored facet of upstream tracking by vendors and suppliers and explaining its barriers and drivers. A survey instrument was designed to determine the current state of materials tracking readiness, digitization barriers, and opportunities. In total, 50 survey responses were obtained. In addition, remarkable case studies on upstream tracking were characterized through the qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with a pre-qualified sample of 13 subject matter experts. Drivers, benefits, and barriers associated with upstream tracking were identified and characterized. For example, a lack of clear return on investment stands a prevailing barrier against the adoption of upstream tracking at every key stakeholder organization, i.e., owners, contractors, and vendors/suppliers. In addition, a disassociation between the fabrication or manufacturing information status of a material component and the physical tracking of such component was characterized as a fundamental difference from onsite tracking practices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129570960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129570960&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/9780784483978.065
DO - 10.1061/9780784483978.065
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85129570960
T3 - Construction Research Congress 2022: Project Management and Delivery, Controls, and Design and Materials - Selected Papers from Construction Research Congress 2022
SP - 638
EP - 647
BT - Construction Research Congress 2022
A2 - Jazizadeh, Farrokh
A2 - Shealy, Tripp
A2 - Garvin, Michael J.
PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
T2 - Construction Research Congress 2022: Project Management and Delivery, Controls, and Design and Materials, CRC 2022
Y2 - 9 March 2022 through 12 March 2022
ER -