Unpopular sovereignties: Democracy and the paradox of "Peoples"

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

So-called démocratie states rest upon acts of violence and exclusion which cannot themselves be justified democratically. Yet, much contemporary political theory takes these configurations for granted as the context for philosophical reflection. This paper explores some of the spatio-temporal paradoxes of popular sovereignty as conventionally understood i. e., as the authorization of government through the consent of "the people." I argue that, instead of treating the borders of popular sovereignty as given, political philosophy would benefit from greater attention to their continual contestation and critique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCrisis and Critique
Subtitle of host publicationPhilosophical Analysis and Current Events: Proceedings of the 42nd International Ludwig Wittgenstein Symposium
Publisherde Gruyter
Pages41-60
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9783110702255
ISBN (Print)9783110702149
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 8 2021

Keywords

  • American Declaration of Independence
  • Dred Scott, "We the People"
  • Gerrymandering
  • Popular sovereignty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Arts and Humanities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unpopular sovereignties: Democracy and the paradox of "Peoples"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this