TY - JOUR
T1 - Twitter impact on a community trauma
T2 - An examination of who, what, and why it radiated
AU - Brown, Mary Ellen
AU - Dustman, Patricia A.
AU - Barthelemy, Juan J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge Nadia Roubicek, Alicia Conte, and Josephine Jakary, of the Office of Community Health, Engagement, and Resiliency in the School of Social Work at Arizona State University, for their assistance in data cross-coding for this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - The study examined the radiating impacts of trauma following the officer-involved shooting of Alton Sterling. Twitter data (#AltonSterling) was collected, filtered, and analyzed using textual and spatial methods. Primary coding encompassed the 30-day period immediately following the shooting. In general, tweets were not used to convey either facts or neutral information, rather, personal opinions dominated. The immediate responses were largely grounded in fear and/or violence. One particularly illuminating finding was the absence of messaging and silence from local leadership. Social media can be a tool to either provide consolatory messaging to promote healing and health, or to spread inflammatory exchanges that perpetuate community discord, further fracture communities and groups, and elevate the risk of retraumatization. Local organizations need established protocols for using social media proactively in the aftermath of community trauma; social media can be a powerful tool for enhancing community cohesion, recovery, and resilience.
AB - The study examined the radiating impacts of trauma following the officer-involved shooting of Alton Sterling. Twitter data (#AltonSterling) was collected, filtered, and analyzed using textual and spatial methods. Primary coding encompassed the 30-day period immediately following the shooting. In general, tweets were not used to convey either facts or neutral information, rather, personal opinions dominated. The immediate responses were largely grounded in fear and/or violence. One particularly illuminating finding was the absence of messaging and silence from local leadership. Social media can be a tool to either provide consolatory messaging to promote healing and health, or to spread inflammatory exchanges that perpetuate community discord, further fracture communities and groups, and elevate the risk of retraumatization. Local organizations need established protocols for using social media proactively in the aftermath of community trauma; social media can be a powerful tool for enhancing community cohesion, recovery, and resilience.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079440414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079440414&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jcop.22330
DO - 10.1002/jcop.22330
M3 - Article
C2 - 32058589
AN - SCOPUS:85079440414
SN - 0090-4392
VL - 49
SP - 838
EP - 853
JO - Journal of Community Psychology
JF - Journal of Community Psychology
IS - 3
ER -