Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Arizona State University Home
Search content at Arizona State University
Home
Profiles
Departments and Centers
Scholarly Works
Activities
Equipment
Grants
Datasets
Prizes
The role of community policies in defensible space compliance
Greg Winter
, Sarah McCaffrey
, Christine A. Vogt
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
37
Link opens in a new tab
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The role of community policies in defensible space compliance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Homeowners
100%
Community Policy
100%
Defensible Space
100%
Local Level
40%
Financial Assistance
40%
Management Policy
40%
Waste Disposal
40%
Disposal Options
40%
Vegetation Management
40%
Wildland Fire
40%
Policy Compliance
40%
Yard Waste
40%
Policy Acceptance
40%
Local Government
20%
Needs-based
20%
Diverse Communities
20%
Focus Group Interviews
20%
Role of Government
20%
Local Jurisdiction
20%
Conceptual Model
20%
State Policy
20%
Insurance
20%
Source Reduction
20%
Network Routing
20%
Ignition Source
20%
Federal Policy
20%
Risk Reduction Strategies
20%
Expert Consultation
20%
Policy Evaluation
20%
Managing Risk
20%
Perceived Risk
20%
Direct Messages
20%
Competing Land Uses
20%
Regulatory Approach
20%
Private Health Insurance
20%
Comprehensive Risk
20%
Program Characteristics
20%
Theory of Reasoned Action
20%
Household Costs
20%
Risk Severity
20%
Fire Management Policy
20%
Neighborhood Norms
20%
Household Yard
20%
Fire-safe
20%
Social Sciences
Financial Aid
100%
Policy Community
100%
Management Policy
100%
Waste Disposal
100%
Legislation
50%
Focus Group
50%
Qualitative Research
50%
Policy Evaluation
50%
Perceived Risk
50%
Land Use
50%
Household
50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Local Government
100%
Perceived Risk
100%
Direct Marketing
100%
Private Insurance
100%
Land Use
100%
Consumer Attitude
100%
Engineering
Local Level
100%
Disposal Option
100%
Policy Management
100%
Collected Data
50%
Source Reduction
50%
Ignition Source
50%
Level Policy
50%
Land Use
50%
Provide Incentive
50%
Computer Science
Defensible Space
100%
Policy Management
50%
Collected Data
25%
And-States
25%
Group Interview
25%
Conceptual Model
25%
Local Jurisdiction
25%
Communication Mode
25%
Reasoned Action
25%