“The Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself”: Predicting College Students’ Voting Behavior Using the Extended Parallel Process Model

Anthony J. Roberto, L. D. Mattson, Paige A. Von Feldt, Xin Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This longitudinal study examines how well the EPPM predicts and explains college students’ voting behavior. One-hundred-and-seventy-eight undergraduate students filled out a survey at two points in time: (1) four weeks before and (2) one week after the 2022 midterm election. As hypothesized, the EPPM accurately predicted danger control outcomes (i.e., severity, susceptibility, self-efficacy, and response efficacy predicted voting intentions, and voting intentions predicted voting behavior). The EPPM also predicted one fear control outcome (though only the path between severity and fear was significant). More specifically, the EPPM explained 45.7% of the variance in intention, 81.7% of the variance in behavior, 77% of the variance in contesting, and 33.6% of the variance in suppression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number628
JournalSocial Sciences
Volume12
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2023

Keywords

  • danger control
  • extended parallel process model (EPPM)
  • fear appeals
  • fear control
  • voting behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“The Only Thing We Have to Fear Is Fear Itself”: Predicting College Students’ Voting Behavior Using the Extended Parallel Process Model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this