The missing hydrogen ion, part-1: Historical precedents vs. fundamental concepts

Robert Robergs, Bridgette O'Malley, Sam Torrens, Jason Siegler

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this review and commentary was to provide an historical and evidence-based account of organic acids and the biochemical and organic chemistry evidence for why cells do not produce metabolites that are acids. The scientific study of acids has a long history dating to the 16th and 17th centuries, and the definition of an acid was proposed in 1884 as a molecule that when in an aqueous solution releases a hydrogen ion (H+). There are three common ionizable functional groups for molecules classified as acids: 1) the carboxyl group, 2) the phosphoryl group and 3) the amine group. The propensity by which a cation will associate or dissociate with a negatively charged atom is quantified by the equilibrium constant (Keq) of the dissociation constant (Kd) of the ionization (Keq ​= ​Kd), which for lactic acid (HLa) vs. lactate (La-) is expressed as: Keq=Kd=[Formula presented]= 4 677.351 4 (ionic strength ​= ​0.01 Mol⋅L-1, T ​= ​25 ​°C). The negative log10 of the dissociation pKd reveals the pH at which half of the molecules are ionized, which for HLa ​= ​3.67. Thus, knowing the pKd and the pH of the solution at question will reveal the extent of the ionization vs. acidification of molecules that are classified as acids.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336-343
Number of pages8
JournalSports Medicine and Health Science
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • Acid
  • Acidosis
  • Dissociation constant (K)
  • Equilibrium constant (K)
  • Hydrogen ion
  • Ionization
  • pH

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The missing hydrogen ion, part-1: Historical precedents vs. fundamental concepts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this