The Machiavellian spirit of montesquieu's liberal republic

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

11 Scopus citations


It is now less controversial than it once was to claim that Machiavelli is a significant presence in Montesquieu's political philosophy. This change stems, Montesquieu might say, from two causes. The more elementary is the “influence scholarship” of the past century, which, after studying Montesquieu's library, the style and themes in his published works, and his comments in letters and notes, concludes that he was substantially indebted to Machiavelli. For example, by 1726 – some eight years before publication of his Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline and some twenty-two years before publishing his masterwork, On the Spirit of Laws – Montesquieu owned The Prince and the Discourses on Livy in Latin and French; eventually he came to possess the works of Machiavelli in Italian as well. However, the narrow methods of such scholarship tend to obscure the extraordinary character of each philosopher's thought and the dialogue a philosopher might have with a predecessor. Montesquieu himself boasts of having examined a sheep's tongue under a microscope (EL 2.14.2), but it is another matter to apply these methods to philosophic works such as Machiavelli's Discourses on Livy and Montesquieu's Considerations on the Romans. The methods and spirit of influence scholarship point to the more interesting cause for lessened controversy over linking these philosophers: that being associated with Machiavelli is no longer scandalous.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationMachiavelli's Liberal Republican Legacy
PublisherCambridge University Press
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9780511509667
ISBN (Print)0521851874, 9780521851879
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences


Dive into the research topics of 'The Machiavellian spirit of montesquieu's liberal republic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this