TY - JOUR
T1 - The engineering and scientific challenges of environmental justice organizations in the US
T2 - A qualitative study
AU - Macias, Madison
AU - Guerrero, Jorge Morales
AU - Schmitt, Edwin A.
AU - Levenda, Anthony M.
AU - Boucher, Jean L.
AU - Karwat, Darshan M.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
First and foremost, we would like to thank all of the participants working in environmental justice organizations across the US for taking the time to talk with us. We thank the reviewers for their helpful comments, which led to the strengthening of the manuscript. This study was partially supported by an EAGER Germination Grant from the National Science Foundation (Award #: 2016108 ) titled: Project Confluence: Engineering and Science to Address Community Needs.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/12/1
Y1 - 2022/12/1
N2 - While there is increased interest among engineers and scientists to collaborate with environmental justice organizations (EJOs), and while there are well-known programs that facilitate collaborations between engineers, scientists, and underserved communities, little is known systematically about the engineering and scientific challenges faced by EJOs. We lay the foundation for such a systematic understanding through exploratory research in which we conducted 47 semi-structured interviews with EJO staff across the United States to ask what their engineering and scientific challenges to combating environmental injustice are. Using deductive-inductive coding we discover that EJOs are looking for support to engineering and scientific challenges that fit specific topical areas and methods. Using the words of our informants, we then unpack the qualitative themes of select topical areas (air quality, public and environmental health, fossil fuel infrastructure, clean and just energy transitions, environmental restoration, and indigenous groups) and methods (data collection, data dissemination, data analysis, spatial analysis, online platform building, networking of experts). We explore the patterns of how these themes overlap with five different strategies (policy change, utilizing the media, educating the public, providing legal advice, and developing collaborative projects) used by the EJOs in our study. We show that EJOs want to collaborate with engineers and scientists to solve technical problems, mitigate harm to their communities, and create positive futures. Our research informs the conception of strategic efforts to expand the impact of engineering and scientific work done to address EJ challenges, particularly given the limited resources that currently exist to support collaborative efforts in this space.
AB - While there is increased interest among engineers and scientists to collaborate with environmental justice organizations (EJOs), and while there are well-known programs that facilitate collaborations between engineers, scientists, and underserved communities, little is known systematically about the engineering and scientific challenges faced by EJOs. We lay the foundation for such a systematic understanding through exploratory research in which we conducted 47 semi-structured interviews with EJO staff across the United States to ask what their engineering and scientific challenges to combating environmental injustice are. Using deductive-inductive coding we discover that EJOs are looking for support to engineering and scientific challenges that fit specific topical areas and methods. Using the words of our informants, we then unpack the qualitative themes of select topical areas (air quality, public and environmental health, fossil fuel infrastructure, clean and just energy transitions, environmental restoration, and indigenous groups) and methods (data collection, data dissemination, data analysis, spatial analysis, online platform building, networking of experts). We explore the patterns of how these themes overlap with five different strategies (policy change, utilizing the media, educating the public, providing legal advice, and developing collaborative projects) used by the EJOs in our study. We show that EJOs want to collaborate with engineers and scientists to solve technical problems, mitigate harm to their communities, and create positive futures. Our research informs the conception of strategic efforts to expand the impact of engineering and scientific work done to address EJ challenges, particularly given the limited resources that currently exist to support collaborative efforts in this space.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85139334946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85139334946&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134463
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134463
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85139334946
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 377
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 134463
ER -