Abstract
In a three-path mediational model, two mediators intervene in a series between an independent and a dependent variable. Methods of testing for mediation in such a model are generalized from the more often used single-mediator model. Six such methods are introduced and compared in a Monte Carlo study in terms of their Type I error, power, and coverage. Based on its results, the joint significance test is preferred when only a hypothesis test is of interest. The percentile bootstrap and bias-corrected bootstrap are preferred when a confidence interval on the mediated effect is desired, with the latter having more power but also slightly inflated Type I error in some conditions.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 241-269 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Organizational Research Methods |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 2008 |
Keywords
- Bootstrapping
- Mediation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Decision Sciences(all)
- Strategy and Management
- Management of Technology and Innovation