Testing for Differential Effects of Forest Fires on Hiking and Mountain Biking Demand and Benefits

John Loomis, Armando González-Cabán, Jeffrey Englin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

76 Scopus citations


Surveys of visitors to National Forests in Colorado were conducted to determine whether different fire ages and presence of crown fires have different effects on hiking and mountain biking recreation visits and benefits. Actual and intended behavior data were combined using a count-data travel cost model. The intended behavior trip questions asked about changes in number of trips due to the presence of a high-intensity crown fire, prescribed fire, and a 20-year-old high-intensity fire at the area respondents were visiting. Using the estimated recreation demand function, years since a non-crown fire had a statistically significant positive effect on the trip demand of hikers. In contrast, presence of crown fires had no statistically significant effect on the quantity of hiker trips, but had a significant and negative effect on mountain biking trips. Crown fires also had a large effect on the value per trip, with crown fires increasing the value per hiking trip but lowering the value per mountain biking trip.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)508-522
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics
Issue number2
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001
Externally publishedYes


  • Consumer surplus
  • Fire
  • Mountain biking
  • Recreation demand
  • Travel cost method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Agronomy and Crop Science
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Testing for Differential Effects of Forest Fires on Hiking and Mountain Biking Demand and Benefits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this