Specificity in a global array is only one possibility

Eric Amazeen; Guy C. van Orden

doi:10.1017/S0140525X04210202

Specificity in a global array is only one possibility

Eric Amazeen, Guy C. van Orden

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The suggestion of seeking specificity in a higher-order array is attractive, but Stoffregen & Bardy (S&B) fail to provide a compelling empirical basis to their claim that specificity exists solely in the global array. Using the example of relative motion, the alternate hypotheses that must be considered are presented.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	887-888
Number of pages	2
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	27
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X04210202
State	Published - Dec 2004

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Physiology
Behavioral Neuroscience

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X04210202

Cite this

@article{57d44aab44e849ea8294501b1c0f9295,

title = "Specificity in a global array is only one possibility",

abstract = "The suggestion of seeking specificity in a higher-order array is attractive, but Stoffregen & Bardy (S&B) fail to provide a compelling empirical basis to their claim that specificity exists solely in the global array. Using the example of relative motion, the alternate hypotheses that must be considered are presented.",

author = "Eric Amazeen and {van Orden}, {Guy C.}",

year = "2004",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X04210202",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "27",

pages = "887--888",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specificity in a global array is only one possibility

AU - Amazeen, Eric

AU - van Orden, Guy C.

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - The suggestion of seeking specificity in a higher-order array is attractive, but Stoffregen & Bardy (S&B) fail to provide a compelling empirical basis to their claim that specificity exists solely in the global array. Using the example of relative motion, the alternate hypotheses that must be considered are presented.

AB - The suggestion of seeking specificity in a higher-order array is attractive, but Stoffregen & Bardy (S&B) fail to provide a compelling empirical basis to their claim that specificity exists solely in the global array. Using the example of relative motion, the alternate hypotheses that must be considered are presented.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21044458328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21044458328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X04210202

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X04210202

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21044458328

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 27

SP - 887

EP - 888

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

IS - 6

ER -

Specificity in a global array is only one possibility

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this