Social and scientific disorder as epistemic phenomena, or the consequences of government dietary guidelines

Scott Scheall, William N. Butos, Thomas Mcquade

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    We begin with a process-oriented model of science according to which signals concerning scientific reputation serve both to coordinate the plans of individuals in the scientific domain and to ensure that the knowledge that emerges from interactions between scientists and the environment is reliable. Under normal circumstances, scientific order emerges from the publication-citation-reputation (PCR) process of science. We adopt and extend F. A. Hayek's epistemology according to which knowledge affords successful plan-based action and we employ this in the development of an epistemic theory of social order. We propose that external interferences with the PCR process have distorting effects on scientific knowledge and, thus, on scientific and social order more broadly. We support this claim by describing the history of the US federal government's development of standardized dietary guidelines for American consumers and its concomitant interference in the PCR process of nutritional science. We conclude that this interference contributed to social disorder in dietary science and beyond.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)431-447
    Number of pages17
    JournalJournal of Institutional Economics
    Volume15
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

    Keywords

    • F.A. Hayek
    • Gary Taubes
    • carbohydrate hypothesis
    • dietary guidelines
    • discovery procedure
    • epistemic theory
    • fat hypothesis
    • pretence of knowledge
    • scientific order
    • social order

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Social and scientific disorder as epistemic phenomena, or the consequences of government dietary guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this