TY - JOUR
T1 - Situated Citizenship: Understanding Sikh Citizenship through Women’s Exclusion
AU - Behl, Natasha
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Democratization scholars point to institutional indicators to argue that Indian democracy is
consolidated and Indian women are full citizens. I point to another set of data to
demonstrate that Indian democracy is at risk because of the gendered nature of citizenship. I
argue that institutional indicators tell a very limited story, because they often render women
and gender invisible. I analyze situated citizenship through semi-structured, in-depth
interview data. I find that respondents naturalize gendered citizenship, which results in a
demarcation of home and marriage as the natural space of Sikh women. I find a situation of
exclusionary inclusion, where women are an essential part of formal institutional democracy,
but are unable to acquire full, substantive citizenship because they are understood as
restricted to home and marriage. These results suggest that Indian democracy is weaker than
democratization literature would suggest because women experience democracy
differentially; women do not have the actual power to be active as citizens, to enjoy a
bundle of rights, and to command democratic participation.
AB - Democratization scholars point to institutional indicators to argue that Indian democracy is
consolidated and Indian women are full citizens. I point to another set of data to
demonstrate that Indian democracy is at risk because of the gendered nature of citizenship. I
argue that institutional indicators tell a very limited story, because they often render women
and gender invisible. I analyze situated citizenship through semi-structured, in-depth
interview data. I find that respondents naturalize gendered citizenship, which results in a
demarcation of home and marriage as the natural space of Sikh women. I find a situation of
exclusionary inclusion, where women are an essential part of formal institutional democracy,
but are unable to acquire full, substantive citizenship because they are understood as
restricted to home and marriage. These results suggest that Indian democracy is weaker than
democratization literature would suggest because women experience democracy
differentially; women do not have the actual power to be active as citizens, to enjoy a
bundle of rights, and to command democratic participation.
U2 - 10.1080/21565503.2014.927775
DO - 10.1080/21565503.2014.927775
M3 - Article
VL - 2
SP - 386
EP - 401
JO - Politics, Groups, and Identities
JF - Politics, Groups, and Identities
ER -