Segregating genetically modified and nongenetically modified corn in a marketing channel

Charles Moss, Troy Schmitz, A. Schmitz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations


The adoption of GM corn in the United States depends on many factors including segregation costs, which have minor impacts on aggregate welfare. Because the demand for nonGM corn is small relative to its supply, no premium for nonGM corn can be generated in excess of the segregation costs. An outward shift in the supply of corn resulting from the adoption of GM varieties has a greater impact on aggregate welfare than do the segregation costs required to satisfy the GM-free demand. A 10% increase in the aggregate supply of GM corn increases aggregate welfare by more than US $250 million. However, nonadopters of GM corn lose while adopters can gain or lose depending on the nature of the aggregate demand curve for US corn.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2765-2774
Number of pages10
JournalApplied Economics
Issue number21
StatePublished - Nov 24 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Segregating genetically modified and nongenetically modified corn in a marketing channel'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this