Science preparedness and science response: Perspectives on the dynamics of preparedness conference

Timothy Lant, Nicole Lurie

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


The ability of the scientific modeling community to meaningfully contribute to postevent response activities during public health emergencies was the direct result of a discrete set of preparedness activities as well as advances in theory and technology. Scientists and decision-makers have recognized the value of developing scientific tools (e.g. models, data sets, communities of practice) to prepare them to be able to respond quickly - in a manner similar to preparedness activities by first-responders and emergency managers. Computational models have matured in their ability to better inform response plans by modeling human behaviors and complex systems. We advocate for further development of science preparedness activities as deliberate actions taken in advance of an unpredicted event (or an event with unknown consequences) to increase the scientific tools and evidence-base available to decision makers and the whole-of-community to limit adverse outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S3-S5
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Issue number5 SUPPL. 2
StatePublished - Sep 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health


Dive into the research topics of 'Science preparedness and science response: Perspectives on the dynamics of preparedness conference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this