TY - JOUR
T1 - “Retweet to Pass the Blunt”
T2 - Analyzing Geographic and Content Features of Cannabis-Related Tweeting Across the United States
AU - Daniulaityte, Raminta
AU - Lamy, Francois R.
AU - Smith, G. Alan
AU - Nahhas, Ramzi W.
AU - Carlson, Robert G.
AU - Thirunarayan, Krishnaprasad
AU - Martins, Silvia S.
AU - Boyer, Edward W.
AU - Sheth, Amit
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant R01 DA039454 (Raminta Daniulaityte/Amit Sheth, principal investigators). *Correspondence may be sent to Raminta Daniulaityte at the Center for Interventions, Treatment, and Addictions Research, Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, 3171 Research Blvd., Suite 124, Dayton, OH 45420-4006, or via email at: raminta.daniulaityte@wright.edu.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Alcohol Research Documentation Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Objective: Twitter data offer new possibilities for tracking health-related communications. This study is among the first to apply advanced information processing to identify geographic and content features of cannabis-related tweeting in the United States. Method: Tweets were collected using streaming Application Programming Interface (March–May 2016) and were processed by eDrugTrends to identify geo-location and classify content by source (personal communication, media, retail) and sentiment (positive, negative, neutral). States were grouped by cannabis legalization policies into “recreational,” “medical, less restric-tive,” “medical, more restrictive,” and “illegal.” Permutation tests were performed to analyze differences among four groups in adjusted percentages of all tweets, unique users, personal communications only, and positive-to-negative sentiment ratios. Results: About 30% of all 13,233,837 cannabis-related tweets had identifiable state-level geo-information. Among geolocated tweets, 76.2% were personal communications, 21.1% media, and 2.7% retail. About 71% of personal communication tweets expressed positive sentiment toward cannabis; 16% expressed negative sentiment. States in the recreational group had significantly greater average adjusted percentage of cannabis tweets (3.01%) compared with other groups. For personal communication tweets only, the recreational group (2.47%) was significantly greater than the medical, more restrictive (1.84%) and illegal (1.85%) groups. Similarly, the recreational group had significantly greater average positive-to-negative sentiment ratio (4.64) compared with the medical, more restrictive (4.15) and illegal (4.19) groups. Average adjusted percentages of unique users showed similar differences between recreational and other groups. Conclusions: States with less restrictive policies displayed greater cannabis-related tweeting and conveyed more positive sentiment. The study demonstrates the potential of Twitter data to become a valuable indicator of drug-related communications in the context of varying policy environments.
AB - Objective: Twitter data offer new possibilities for tracking health-related communications. This study is among the first to apply advanced information processing to identify geographic and content features of cannabis-related tweeting in the United States. Method: Tweets were collected using streaming Application Programming Interface (March–May 2016) and were processed by eDrugTrends to identify geo-location and classify content by source (personal communication, media, retail) and sentiment (positive, negative, neutral). States were grouped by cannabis legalization policies into “recreational,” “medical, less restric-tive,” “medical, more restrictive,” and “illegal.” Permutation tests were performed to analyze differences among four groups in adjusted percentages of all tweets, unique users, personal communications only, and positive-to-negative sentiment ratios. Results: About 30% of all 13,233,837 cannabis-related tweets had identifiable state-level geo-information. Among geolocated tweets, 76.2% were personal communications, 21.1% media, and 2.7% retail. About 71% of personal communication tweets expressed positive sentiment toward cannabis; 16% expressed negative sentiment. States in the recreational group had significantly greater average adjusted percentage of cannabis tweets (3.01%) compared with other groups. For personal communication tweets only, the recreational group (2.47%) was significantly greater than the medical, more restrictive (1.84%) and illegal (1.85%) groups. Similarly, the recreational group had significantly greater average positive-to-negative sentiment ratio (4.64) compared with the medical, more restrictive (4.15) and illegal (4.19) groups. Average adjusted percentages of unique users showed similar differences between recreational and other groups. Conclusions: States with less restrictive policies displayed greater cannabis-related tweeting and conveyed more positive sentiment. The study demonstrates the potential of Twitter data to become a valuable indicator of drug-related communications in the context of varying policy environments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032933039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032933039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.910
DO - 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.910
M3 - Article
C2 - 29087826
AN - SCOPUS:85032933039
SN - 1937-1888
VL - 78
SP - 910
EP - 915
JO - Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs
JF - Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs
IS - 6
ER -