Publishing an applied statistics paper: Guidance and advice from editors

Christine M. Anderson-Cook, Lu Lu, Robert B. Gramacy, L. Allison Jones-Farmer, Douglas C. Montgomery, William H. Woodall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

One of the tasks required of most statistics researchers and academic faculty is to publish their innovative ideas in the peer-reviewed literature. In this paper, we provide guidance about the different stages of the process as experienced authors and offer advice from those who hold the decision about the success or failure of these papers, namely the editors of applied statistics journals. The paper is organized into four sections focusing on the different stages of publishing: (1) Planning what to write about, where to submit and how to organize the paper; (2) The process of writing the paper; (3) Interpreting and responding to peer-reviews from the journal editors and referees to prepare for resubmission; and (4) General comments about the publication process, including collaboration and mentoring. Each section starts with fundamentals provided by the moderators (C.A.C. and L.L.) on key aspects to consider on each topic and then is followed with discussion from some current and past editors of impactful journals in the field of applied statistics. Our hope is that this collection of insights may help accelerate learning about the process for young researchers and help all researchers to understand some of the important often-unspoken aspects of the process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalQuality and Reliability Engineering International
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • choice of journal
  • collaboration
  • mentoring
  • paper organization
  • review process
  • styles of papers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Publishing an applied statistics paper: Guidance and advice from editors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this