TY - JOUR
T1 - Physical activity in the summer heat
T2 - How hot weather moderates the relationship between built environment features and outdoor physical activity of adults
AU - Lanza, Kevin
AU - Stone, Brian
AU - Chakalian, Paul M.
AU - Gronlund, Carina J.
AU - Hondula, David M.
AU - Larsen, Larissa
AU - Mallen, Evan
AU - Haardörfer, Regine
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Research has not yet examined how hot weather moderates the relationship between the built environment and outdoor physical activity levels. The authors posited that hot days will increase the magnitude of the expected directional effect of built environment features on physical activity. Methods: This longitudinal study included 134 US adults from the Three city Heat and Electrical failure AdapTation study. Adults self-reported physical activity for multiple summer days (nstudy-days = 742) in 2016. Hot days were defined as ≥90th percentile of daily maximum heat index. Built environment features included density, safety, trees, hilliness, connectivity, access to parks, and access to shops + services. Separate growth curve models with interaction terms (ie, hot day × built environment feature) were run for daily minutes of outdoor physical activity (ie, any activity and recommended activity). Results: Neither hot days nor built environment features impacted outdoor physical activity significantly, and hot days did not moderate the relationship between built environment features and physical activity (P > .05). Conclusions:With adults failing to modify behavior on hot days, cities may be placing adults at increased risk of exertional heat illness. The authors recommend incorporating the risk of exertional heat illness in health impact assessments and deploying heat management strategies.
AB - Background: Research has not yet examined how hot weather moderates the relationship between the built environment and outdoor physical activity levels. The authors posited that hot days will increase the magnitude of the expected directional effect of built environment features on physical activity. Methods: This longitudinal study included 134 US adults from the Three city Heat and Electrical failure AdapTation study. Adults self-reported physical activity for multiple summer days (nstudy-days = 742) in 2016. Hot days were defined as ≥90th percentile of daily maximum heat index. Built environment features included density, safety, trees, hilliness, connectivity, access to parks, and access to shops + services. Separate growth curve models with interaction terms (ie, hot day × built environment feature) were run for daily minutes of outdoor physical activity (ie, any activity and recommended activity). Results: Neither hot days nor built environment features impacted outdoor physical activity significantly, and hot days did not moderate the relationship between built environment features and physical activity (P > .05). Conclusions:With adults failing to modify behavior on hot days, cities may be placing adults at increased risk of exertional heat illness. The authors recommend incorporating the risk of exertional heat illness in health impact assessments and deploying heat management strategies.
KW - Health determinants
KW - Heat management strategies
KW - Public health practice
KW - Temperature
KW - Urban climate
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85082331500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85082331500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jpah.2019-0399
DO - 10.1123/jpah.2019-0399
M3 - Article
C2 - 31918409
AN - SCOPUS:85082331500
SN - 1543-3080
VL - 17
SP - 261
EP - 269
JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
IS - 3
ER -