TY - JOUR
T1 - Past and Present Design Practices and Uncertainty in Climate Projections are Challenges for Designing Infrastructure to Future Conditions
AU - Underwood, Benjamin Shane
AU - Mascaro, Giuseppe
AU - Chester, Mikhail V.
AU - Fraser, Andrew
AU - Lopez-Cantu, Tania
AU - Samaras, Constantine
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling, which is responsible for Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), and we thank the climate modeling groups (in the appendix of this paper) for producing and making available their model output. For CMIP the DOE’s Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison provides coordinating support and led development of software infrastructure in partnership with the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals. We also acknowledge the USGS for creating and distributing the watershed boundary dataset. This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF Collaborative Award No. CMMI 1635638/1635686) and the UCAR Next Generation Fellowship. Student support for T.L.-C. was also provided by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologa (CONACYT).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Designing infrastructure for a changing climate remains a major challenge for engineers. In popular discourse a narrative has emerged that infrastructures are likely underdesigned for the future. Weather-related hazards are directly embedded in the infrastructure design process. Yet the codes and standards that engineers use for this risk analysis have been changing for decades, sometimes increasing and other times decreasing design values. Further complicating the issue is that climate projections show increasing or decreasing intensities depending on the hazard and region. Thus, it is not clear that infrastructure is universally underdesigned. Here, analyses are developed at both regional and national scales using precipitation and roadway drainage systems to answer this question. First, it is shown that modeling uncertainty can pose challenges for using future projections to update region-specific standards. Second, the results show that depending on the historical design conditions and the direction of projections, roadway drainage infrastructures may be designed appropriately in some regions while in others they are possibly underdesigned. Given these uncertainties, the authors believe that there is a need for alternative design paradigms, and these needs are discussed.
AB - Designing infrastructure for a changing climate remains a major challenge for engineers. In popular discourse a narrative has emerged that infrastructures are likely underdesigned for the future. Weather-related hazards are directly embedded in the infrastructure design process. Yet the codes and standards that engineers use for this risk analysis have been changing for decades, sometimes increasing and other times decreasing design values. Further complicating the issue is that climate projections show increasing or decreasing intensities depending on the hazard and region. Thus, it is not clear that infrastructure is universally underdesigned. Here, analyses are developed at both regional and national scales using precipitation and roadway drainage systems to answer this question. First, it is shown that modeling uncertainty can pose challenges for using future projections to update region-specific standards. Second, the results show that depending on the historical design conditions and the direction of projections, roadway drainage infrastructures may be designed appropriately in some regions while in others they are possibly underdesigned. Given these uncertainties, the authors believe that there is a need for alternative design paradigms, and these needs are discussed.
KW - Climate change
KW - Failure
KW - Infrastructure
KW - Resilience
KW - Uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087662260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087662260&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000567
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000567
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087662260
SN - 1076-0342
VL - 26
JO - Journal of Infrastructure Systems
JF - Journal of Infrastructure Systems
IS - 3
M1 - 04020026
ER -