Orientation-specificity in kinesthetic spatial learning: The role of multiple orientations

Clark C. Presson, Nina DeLange, Mark D. Hazelrigg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations


In the current study we tested whether multiple orientations in kinesthetic learning affected how flexibly spatial information is stored and later used in making location judgments. Three groups learned simple routes by walking them while blindfolded, with (1) multiple orientations achieved through normal walking, (2) multiple orientations achieved through backward walking, or (3) a single orientation achieved through walking without turning (which required forward, backward, and sideways walking). When subjects had experienced multiple orientations while learning the routes, later directional judgments were equally accurate (and equally rapid) regardless of whether the judgments were aligned or were contra-aligned with the orientation of the routes as originally learned. In contrast, when routes were learned in a single orientation (without turning), subsequent judgments on contra-aligned trials were both less accurate and slower than judgments on aligned trials. Thus, multiple orientations are important to establish orientation-free, flexible use of spatial information in a kinesthetic learning environment. This contrasts with the pattern of results typically found in visual spatial learning and suggests that the factors that affect orientation specificity of spatial use may differ across spatial modality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)225-229
Number of pages5
JournalMemory & Cognition
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1987

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)


Dive into the research topics of 'Orientation-specificity in kinesthetic spatial learning: The role of multiple orientations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this