On separate paths: The Mexican American and African American legal campaigns against school segregation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was a landmark decision that was the result of decades of efforts by grassroots activists and civil rights organizations to end legalized segregation. A less well-known effort challenged the extralegal segregation of Mexican American students in the Southwest. I combine original research and research synthesis to explore the connections between these legal campaigns. Three key differences between African American and Mexican American segregation had important implications for the legal strategies in the latter: (a) de jure versus extralegal segregation; (b) the legal whiteness ofMexican Americans; and (c) the racialization oflanguage. While both sets oflawsuits drew on social science research to challenge segregation, differences in timing and legal arguments seem to have prevented sustained connections between the two efforts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-55
Number of pages27
JournalAmerican Journal of Education
Volume121
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On separate paths: The Mexican American and African American legal campaigns against school segregation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this