TY - JOUR
T1 - Normalizing emotion in organizations
T2 - Making the extraordinary seem ordinary
AU - Ashforth, Blake
AU - Kreiner, Glen E.
N1 - Funding Information:
This article was funded by grants from the Dean's Award of Excellence Program, College of Business, Arizona State University, and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (#410-96-0770). We thank Suzy Fox and Paul Spector for their very helpful comments.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - Organizations use various means of regulating socially undesirable emotions, including normalizing. We define normalizing as institutionalized processes by which extraordinary situations are rendered seemingly ordinary. Four means of normalizing are discussed: (1) diffusing, where undesired emotions are dissipated or their impact is reduced; (2) reframing, where emotions or the situation are recast such that the emotions are forestalled, redefined, or rendered more acceptable; (3) adaptation, where repeated exposure to a situation reduces its emotional impact; and (4) ritualism, where the enactment of standardized procedures provides a sense of control and a momentum of means, thereby reducing emotions. We conclude that because normalizing often has a strong "as if" or pretend quality-requiring ongoing and mutual face-work, often supported by symbolic management-it is an inherently fragile practice that is easier to sustain in groups than as individuals.
AB - Organizations use various means of regulating socially undesirable emotions, including normalizing. We define normalizing as institutionalized processes by which extraordinary situations are rendered seemingly ordinary. Four means of normalizing are discussed: (1) diffusing, where undesired emotions are dissipated or their impact is reduced; (2) reframing, where emotions or the situation are recast such that the emotions are forestalled, redefined, or rendered more acceptable; (3) adaptation, where repeated exposure to a situation reduces its emotional impact; and (4) ritualism, where the enactment of standardized procedures provides a sense of control and a momentum of means, thereby reducing emotions. We conclude that because normalizing often has a strong "as if" or pretend quality-requiring ongoing and mutual face-work, often supported by symbolic management-it is an inherently fragile practice that is easier to sustain in groups than as individuals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036234402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036234402&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00047-5
DO - 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00047-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036234402
SN - 1053-4822
VL - 12
SP - 215
EP - 235
JO - Human Resource Management Review
JF - Human Resource Management Review
IS - 2
ER -