TY - JOUR
T1 - Modulation of sucrose response thresholds in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.)
T2 - Influence of genotype, feeding, and foraging experience
AU - Pankiw, Tanya
AU - Waddington, Keith D.
AU - Page, Robert E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgements This work was funded by grants from the NIH and NSF to REP. Thanks to MK Fondrk, H Chan, DR Tarpy, and KA Copren for assistance. We also thank anonymous reviewers for comments that improved this manuscript. All animals were treated in accordance with the Principles of Animal Care, NIH Publication No. 86-23, revised in 1985.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - The perception of sugar is important to honey bees for making foraging decisions. We measured bees' perception by determining what concentration of sucrose touched to the antennae elicited the proboscis extension response (response threshold). A low response threshold (extension at low concentration) suggests a high perceptual value of sucrose, and vice versa. Perception of sucrose solutions differed between two artificially selected genotypic strains and was modulated by the bees' recent feeding experiences. Bees offered 10%, 30%, or 50% sucrose solutions in small cages overnight, and in large flight-cages or free-flying in the field for several days, had subsequent response thresholds positively correlated to the concentration offered. Empty bees, whether they were nectar, water or pollen foragers, dancers or non-dancers, had a significantly lower threshold than loaded bees. Crop volume affected response thresholds directly and independently of sucrose concentration. We interpret these findings as multiple mechanisms that operate in different time scales, modulating perception of sucrose. Changes occurred in the time scale of evolutionary processes as demonstrated by genotypic differences. Changes with foraging experience occur in hours or minutes while effects of crop filling are instantaneous.
AB - The perception of sugar is important to honey bees for making foraging decisions. We measured bees' perception by determining what concentration of sucrose touched to the antennae elicited the proboscis extension response (response threshold). A low response threshold (extension at low concentration) suggests a high perceptual value of sucrose, and vice versa. Perception of sucrose solutions differed between two artificially selected genotypic strains and was modulated by the bees' recent feeding experiences. Bees offered 10%, 30%, or 50% sucrose solutions in small cages overnight, and in large flight-cages or free-flying in the field for several days, had subsequent response thresholds positively correlated to the concentration offered. Empty bees, whether they were nectar, water or pollen foragers, dancers or non-dancers, had a significantly lower threshold than loaded bees. Crop volume affected response thresholds directly and independently of sucrose concentration. We interpret these findings as multiple mechanisms that operate in different time scales, modulating perception of sucrose. Changes occurred in the time scale of evolutionary processes as demonstrated by genotypic differences. Changes with foraging experience occur in hours or minutes while effects of crop filling are instantaneous.
KW - Behavior
KW - Honey bee
KW - Neuroethology
KW - Response thresholds
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034944410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034944410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s003590100201
DO - 10.1007/s003590100201
M3 - Article
C2 - 11467502
AN - SCOPUS:0034944410
SN - 0340-7594
VL - 187
SP - 293
EP - 301
JO - Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
JF - Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
IS - 4
ER -