TY - JOUR
T1 - Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire
T2 - How Fact-Checking Influences Citizens’ Reactions to Negative Advertising
AU - Fridkin, Kim
AU - Kenney, Patrick
AU - Wintersieck, Amanda
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Crown copyright.
PY - 2015/1/2
Y1 - 2015/1/2
N2 - Electoral campaigns are dynamic and an important change in recent elections is the growth of fact-checking; the assessment of the truthfulness of political advertisements by news media organizations and watchdog groups. In this article, we examine the role that fact-checks play in shaping citizens’ views of negative commercials and political candidates. We rely on an Internet survey experiment where we vary people’s exposure to negative advertisements and a follow-up fact-check article (i.e., no fact-check, accurate fact-check, inaccurate fact-check). The results of our experiment show that fact-checks influence people’s assessments of the accuracy, usefulness, and tone of negative political ads. Furthermore, sophisticated citizens and citizens with low tolerance for negative campaigning are most responsive to fact-checks. The fact-checks also sway citizens’ likelihood of accepting the claims made in the advertisements. Finally, negative fact-checks (e.g., fact-checks challenging the truthfulness of the claims of the negative commercial) are more powerful than positive fact-checks.
AB - Electoral campaigns are dynamic and an important change in recent elections is the growth of fact-checking; the assessment of the truthfulness of political advertisements by news media organizations and watchdog groups. In this article, we examine the role that fact-checks play in shaping citizens’ views of negative commercials and political candidates. We rely on an Internet survey experiment where we vary people’s exposure to negative advertisements and a follow-up fact-check article (i.e., no fact-check, accurate fact-check, inaccurate fact-check). The results of our experiment show that fact-checks influence people’s assessments of the accuracy, usefulness, and tone of negative political ads. Furthermore, sophisticated citizens and citizens with low tolerance for negative campaigning are most responsive to fact-checks. The fact-checks also sway citizens’ likelihood of accepting the claims made in the advertisements. Finally, negative fact-checks (e.g., fact-checks challenging the truthfulness of the claims of the negative commercial) are more powerful than positive fact-checks.
KW - campaigns
KW - elections
KW - fact-checking
KW - negative campaigning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922327904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922327904&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10584609.2014.914613
DO - 10.1080/10584609.2014.914613
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84922327904
SN - 1058-4609
VL - 32
SP - 127
EP - 151
JO - Political Communication
JF - Political Communication
IS - 1
ER -