TY - JOUR
T1 - Lessons from within
T2 - redesigning higher education
AU - Hale, Annie
AU - Archambault, Leanna
AU - Wenrick, Lukas
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors and the Biodesign Pathfinder Center research team under the leadership of Dr. Lee Hartwell at Arizona State University would like to thank the Bezos Family Foundation for the generous support provided to develop, implement, and research the Studio Project. This article was undertaken solely by the listed authors. The Bezos Family Foundation had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. ASU research award number: AWD00033570. Institutional review board study number: STUDY00010173.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Annie Hale, Leanna Archambault and Lukas Wenrick.
PY - 2020/4/15
Y1 - 2020/4/15
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine real experiences and challenges from personnel engaged in reforming and transforming the higher education ecosystem at a major university in the desert southwest. Design/methodology/approach: Through a case study approach, we use narrative analysis and a constant comparative method with three researchers who work closely in this space. Findings: Ten categories were identified through a close review of collected data from ten participants through an IRB approved process. Recommendations include clarifying the purpose and using transparent terminology for both implementers and learners as well as figuring out ways to help learners navigate learning pathways. Personnel yearn to be involved early and often to be able to shape major transformations that make use of their efforts and expertise. Research limitations/implications: Exploring phenomenon in context at one university can highlight nuances that exist at this particular case study site and may not be generalizable. Practical implications: Sharing real experiences and challenges from those who have begun to implement change in higher education is critical and will bolster those working to push learning forward into the 21st century. To meet the needs of learners at the pre-college, college, and post-college levels, universities need to innovate beyond the traditional modes of education. Originality/value: It is not often that researchers explore and analyze the struggles and successes of personnel on the ground, working to actualize a major educational shift in higher education. The ten categories denoted in this paper are a pivotal entry point for review that can support others who are engaging or beginning to make changes in their context – pushing one beyond known considerations.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine real experiences and challenges from personnel engaged in reforming and transforming the higher education ecosystem at a major university in the desert southwest. Design/methodology/approach: Through a case study approach, we use narrative analysis and a constant comparative method with three researchers who work closely in this space. Findings: Ten categories were identified through a close review of collected data from ten participants through an IRB approved process. Recommendations include clarifying the purpose and using transparent terminology for both implementers and learners as well as figuring out ways to help learners navigate learning pathways. Personnel yearn to be involved early and often to be able to shape major transformations that make use of their efforts and expertise. Research limitations/implications: Exploring phenomenon in context at one university can highlight nuances that exist at this particular case study site and may not be generalizable. Practical implications: Sharing real experiences and challenges from those who have begun to implement change in higher education is critical and will bolster those working to push learning forward into the 21st century. To meet the needs of learners at the pre-college, college, and post-college levels, universities need to innovate beyond the traditional modes of education. Originality/value: It is not often that researchers explore and analyze the struggles and successes of personnel on the ground, working to actualize a major educational shift in higher education. The ten categories denoted in this paper are a pivotal entry point for review that can support others who are engaging or beginning to make changes in their context – pushing one beyond known considerations.
KW - Changing role of higher education
KW - Educational change
KW - Higher education
KW - Higher education administration
KW - Institutional change
KW - Transformation of higher education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081023319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081023319&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/DLO-09-2019-0203
DO - 10.1108/DLO-09-2019-0203
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081023319
SN - 1477-7282
VL - 34
SP - 37
EP - 40
JO - Development and Learning in Organizations
JF - Development and Learning in Organizations
IS - 2
ER -