Language translation during disaster: A comparative analysis of five national approaches

Sharon O'Brien, Federico Federici, Patrick Cadwell, Jay Marlowe, Brian Gerber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clear, timely and accurate information is recognised as strategically and operationally critical to disaster response effectiveness. Increasing cultural and linguistic diversity across the globe creates a demand for information to be available in multiple languages. This signifies a need for language translation to be a key element of disaster management. However, language translation is an underdeveloped tool in disaster management and has been a neglected topic in research. We analyse the disaster response approaches for five nations—Ireland, the UK, New Zealand, Japan and the USA—to determine the degree to which language translation is utilised. Taking the right to information as a starting point, we use a 4-A, rights-based analytic framework. Each approach is inspected for standards of Availability, Accessibility, Acceptability and Adaptability. The US has the strongest adherence to these standards while the other approaches are less developed. We suggest several principles for effective practice in providing language access services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)627-636
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Volume31
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

Keywords

  • 4-A framework
  • Disasters
  • Interpreting
  • Linguistic diversity
  • Translation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Safety Research
  • Geology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Language translation during disaster: A comparative analysis of five national approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this