Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance

Parthiban David, Matt Bloom, Amy Hillman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

352 Scopus citations


We study relationships between shareholder proposal activism, managerial response, and corporate social performance (CSP). We find that shareholder proposal activism reduces CSP. We infer that rather than pressuring firms to improve CSP, activism may engender diversion of resources away from CSP into political activities used by managers to resist external pressures and retain discretion. We also find that managers are more likely to settle proposals filed by 'salient' shareholders (i.e., those with power, legitimacy, and urgency). Settlement with salient shareholders, however, also reduces CSP, suggesting that managers' responses are symbolic; i.e., they settle with salient shareholders to demonstrate conformance but continue to resist making the substantive changes to core policies that may compromise their discretion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-100
Number of pages10
JournalStrategic Management Journal
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2007


  • Corporate governance
  • Corporate social performance
  • Investor activism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management


Dive into the research topics of 'Investor activism, managerial responsiveness, and corporate social performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this