Internal control quality and bank risk-taking and performance

Matthew Baugh, Matthew S. Ege, Christopher G. Yust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations


SUMMARY: Using a sample of bank-years from 2005 to 2017, we examine the effect of internal control quality on future risk-taking and performance. We find that banks that disclose a material weakness in internal controls have higher risk-taking and worse performance in the future, including having a higher (lower) likelihood of experiencing large losses (gains). These findings suggest that weak controls increase (reduce) downside (upside) risk-taking or conversely that strong controls increase (reduce) upside (downside) risk-taking. Path analyses suggest that 22.3 to 43.7 percent of the effect of internal control quality on future performance is through risk-taking. Additionally, material weaknesses are negatively associated with total asset, loan, interest income, and non-interest income growth, suggesting that internal control quality affects both core and non-core activities of banks. Overall, results suggest that strong internal controls improve bank risk-taking, in part through asymmetrically reducing downside risk-taking while facilitating upside risk-taking, ultimately improving bank performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-84
Number of pages36
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 2021


  • Bank performance
  • Bank upside and downside risk-taking
  • Internal control quality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics


Dive into the research topics of 'Internal control quality and bank risk-taking and performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this