TY - JOUR
T1 - Informational richness and its impact on algorithmic fairness
AU - Di Bello, Marcello
AU - Gong, Ruobin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - The literature on algorithmic fairness has examined exogenous sources of biases such as shortcomings in the data and structural injustices in society. It has also examined internal sources of bias as evidenced by a number of impossibility theorems showing that no algorithm can concurrently satisfy multiple criteria of fairness. This paper contributes to the literature stemming from the impossibility theorems by examining how informational richness affects the accuracy and fairness of predictive algorithms. With the aid of a computer simulation, we show that informational richness is the engine that drives improvements in the performance of a predictive algorithm, in terms of both accuracy and fairness. The centrality of informational richness suggests that classification parity, a popular criterion of algorithmic fairness, should be given relatively little weight. But we caution that the centrality of informational richness should be taken with a grain of salt in light of practical limitations, in particular, the so-called bias-variance trade off.
AB - The literature on algorithmic fairness has examined exogenous sources of biases such as shortcomings in the data and structural injustices in society. It has also examined internal sources of bias as evidenced by a number of impossibility theorems showing that no algorithm can concurrently satisfy multiple criteria of fairness. This paper contributes to the literature stemming from the impossibility theorems by examining how informational richness affects the accuracy and fairness of predictive algorithms. With the aid of a computer simulation, we show that informational richness is the engine that drives improvements in the performance of a predictive algorithm, in terms of both accuracy and fairness. The centrality of informational richness suggests that classification parity, a popular criterion of algorithmic fairness, should be given relatively little weight. But we caution that the centrality of informational richness should be taken with a grain of salt in light of practical limitations, in particular, the so-called bias-variance trade off.
KW - Algorithmic fairness
KW - Bias-variance trade off
KW - Classification parity
KW - Computer simulation
KW - Conscientiousness
KW - Impossibility theorems
KW - Informational richness
KW - Predictive parity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164562858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85164562858&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11098-023-02004-7
DO - 10.1007/s11098-023-02004-7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85164562858
SN - 0031-8116
JO - Philosophical Studies
JF - Philosophical Studies
ER -