TY - JOUR
T1 - GIS
T2 - Tool or science? Demystifying the persistent ambiguity of GIS as "tool" versus "science"
AU - Wright, Dawn J.
AU - Goodchild, Michael F.
AU - Proctor, James D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors wish to thank Pete Peterson, Kristin Lovelace, Steve Behnke, and Ray Smith at UCSB for fruitful discussions. The critical reviews of Helen Cou- clelis and Alan Brenner significantly improved the manuscript. The National Center for Geographical Information and Analysis is supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement SBR 88-10917.
PY - 1997/6
Y1 - 1997/6
N2 - Is GIS a tool or a science? The question is clearly important in the day-to-day operations of geography departments. Departments need to know if GIS is a tool that should be taught at the undergraduate level, or a science and thus a legitimate research specialty of faculty and graduate students. We summarize the debate on this question that was conducted on GIS-L electronic listserver in late 1993. In evaluating this discussion it became clear that GIS could be understood not by the two distinct positions taken by the GIS-L discussants but as three positions along a continuum ranging from tool to science. These positions attach several meanings to "doing GIS." These are (1) GIS as tool, i.e., the use of a particular class of software, associated hardware tools, and digital geographic data in order to advance some specific purpose; (2) GIS as toolmaking, i.e., the advancement of the tool's capabilities and facilities (ease of use); and (3) the science of GIS, i.e., the analysis of the fundamental issues raised by the use of GIS. Recognizing the importance of understanding what is meant by "doing science" as well as what is meant by "doing GIS," we conclude that only one of these positions - "the science of GIS" - is a sufficient condition for science. The "toolmaker" position is rarely able to meet the test of science; and the "GIS is a tool" position involves "doing science" only if it yields progress on some substantive problem. The debate is certainly problematic in light of the variety of perspectives on science and on GIS. The persistence of the issue suggests, however, that the GIS community should continue to work toward a resolution.
AB - Is GIS a tool or a science? The question is clearly important in the day-to-day operations of geography departments. Departments need to know if GIS is a tool that should be taught at the undergraduate level, or a science and thus a legitimate research specialty of faculty and graduate students. We summarize the debate on this question that was conducted on GIS-L electronic listserver in late 1993. In evaluating this discussion it became clear that GIS could be understood not by the two distinct positions taken by the GIS-L discussants but as three positions along a continuum ranging from tool to science. These positions attach several meanings to "doing GIS." These are (1) GIS as tool, i.e., the use of a particular class of software, associated hardware tools, and digital geographic data in order to advance some specific purpose; (2) GIS as toolmaking, i.e., the advancement of the tool's capabilities and facilities (ease of use); and (3) the science of GIS, i.e., the analysis of the fundamental issues raised by the use of GIS. Recognizing the importance of understanding what is meant by "doing science" as well as what is meant by "doing GIS," we conclude that only one of these positions - "the science of GIS" - is a sufficient condition for science. The "toolmaker" position is rarely able to meet the test of science; and the "GIS is a tool" position involves "doing science" only if it yields progress on some substantive problem. The debate is certainly problematic in light of the variety of perspectives on science and on GIS. The persistence of the issue suggests, however, that the GIS community should continue to work toward a resolution.
KW - GIS-L
KW - Geographic information science
KW - Geographic thought
KW - Nature and philosophy of science
KW - Nature of geographic information systems
KW - Systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=5544235996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=5544235996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/0004-5608.872057
DO - 10.1111/0004-5608.872057
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:5544235996
SN - 0004-5608
VL - 87
SP - 346
EP - 362
JO - Annals of the Association of American Geographers
JF - Annals of the Association of American Geographers
IS - 2
ER -