TY - JOUR
T1 - Forensic psychology and correctional psychology
T2 - Distinct but related subfields of psychological science and practice
AU - Neal, Tess
N1 - Funding Information:
Shah subsequently served as a major force in the development of both forensic and correctional psychology (as well as other mental health–law subfields, broadly defined—including related disciplines outside of psychology; see Table 2 in the online supplemental materials; Brodsky, 1995; Voit, 1995). For example, the first modern prison classification system, developed in 1971, was funded by Shah and his center (Jesness, 1988). Brodsky’s organization of the Lake Wales Conference and the subsequent edited volume, Psychologists in the Criminal Justice System (Brodsky, 1973)–which is credited with ushering in the modern era of correctional psychology—were funded in part and supported by Shah. The first forensic assessment instrument, a trial competency screening instrument, was developed through funding by Shah (Laboratory of Community Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 1973). And Monahan’s early study of the problems with clinician’s predictions of violence— especially in legal settings—was funded by Shah (Monahan, 1981).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - This article delineates 2 separate but related subfields of psychological science and practice applicable across all major areas of the field (e.g., clinical, counseling, developmental, social, cognitive, community). Forensic and correctional psychology are related by their historical roots, involvement in the justice system, and the shared population of people they study and serve. The practical and ethical contexts of these subfields is distinct from other areas of psychology-and from one another-with important implications for ecologically valid research and ethically sound practice. Forensic psychology is a subfield of psychology in which basic and applied psychological science or scientifically oriented professional practice is applied to the law to help resolve legal, contractual, or administrative matters. Correctional psychology is a subfield of psychology in which basic and applied psychological science or scientifically oriented professional practice is applied to the justice system to inform the classification, treatment, and management of offenders to reduce risk and improve public safety. There has been and continues to be great interest in both subfields- especially the potential for forensic and correctional psychological science to help resolve practical issues and questions in legal and justice settings. This article traces the shared and separate developmental histories of these subfields, outlines their important distinctions and implications, and provides a common understanding and shared language for psychologists interested in applying their knowledge in forensic or correctional contexts.
AB - This article delineates 2 separate but related subfields of psychological science and practice applicable across all major areas of the field (e.g., clinical, counseling, developmental, social, cognitive, community). Forensic and correctional psychology are related by their historical roots, involvement in the justice system, and the shared population of people they study and serve. The practical and ethical contexts of these subfields is distinct from other areas of psychology-and from one another-with important implications for ecologically valid research and ethically sound practice. Forensic psychology is a subfield of psychology in which basic and applied psychological science or scientifically oriented professional practice is applied to the law to help resolve legal, contractual, or administrative matters. Correctional psychology is a subfield of psychology in which basic and applied psychological science or scientifically oriented professional practice is applied to the justice system to inform the classification, treatment, and management of offenders to reduce risk and improve public safety. There has been and continues to be great interest in both subfields- especially the potential for forensic and correctional psychological science to help resolve practical issues and questions in legal and justice settings. This article traces the shared and separate developmental histories of these subfields, outlines their important distinctions and implications, and provides a common understanding and shared language for psychologists interested in applying their knowledge in forensic or correctional contexts.
KW - Correctional
KW - Ethic
KW - Forensic
KW - Proficiency
KW - Specialty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049859013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049859013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/amp0000227
DO - 10.1037/amp0000227
M3 - Article
C2 - 29431456
AN - SCOPUS:85049859013
SN - 0003-066X
VL - 73
SP - 651
EP - 662
JO - American Psychologist
JF - American Psychologist
IS - 5
ER -