Forensic psychologists' perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluations

Tess Neal, Stanley L. Brodsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

85 Scopus citations


A qualitative study with 20 board-certified forensic psychologists was followed up by a mail survey of 351 forensic psychologists in this mixed-methods investigation of examiner bias awareness and strategies used to debias forensic judgments. Rich qualitative data emerged about awareness of bias, specific biasing situations that recur in forensic evaluations, and potential debiasing strategies. The continuum of bias awareness in forensic evaluators mapped cogently onto the "stages of change" model. Evaluators perceived themselves as less vulnerable to bias than their colleagues, consistent with the phenomenon called the "bias blind spot." Recurring situations that posed challenges for forensic clinicians included disliking or feeling sympathy for the defendant, disgust or anger toward the offense, limited cultural competency, preexisting values, colleagues' influences, and protecting referral streams. Twenty-five debiasing strategies emerged in the qualitative study, all but 1 of which rated as highly useful in the quantitative survey. Some of those strategies are consistent with empirical evidence about their effectiveness, but others have been shown to be ineffective. We identified which strategies do not help (such as introspection), focused on promising strategies with empirical support, discussed additional promising strategies not mentioned by participants, and described new strategies generated by these participants that have not yet been subjected to empirical examination. Finally, debiasing strategies were considered with respect to future directions for research and forensic practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)58-76
Number of pages19
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016


  • Bias
  • Decision making
  • Expert judgment
  • Forensic
  • Mixed methods
  • Qualitative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Forensic psychologists' perceptions of bias and potential correction strategies in forensic mental health evaluations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this