TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaporative misters for urban cooling and comfort
T2 - effectiveness and motivations for use
AU - Vanos, Jennifer K.
AU - Wright, Mary K.
AU - Kaiser, Alana
AU - Middel, Ariane
AU - Ambrose, Harrison
AU - Hondula, David M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was conducted as part of the Urban Water Innovation Network, supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement 1444758. The authors appreciate administrative support and guidance from Alan Berkowitz, Aude Lochet, Matei Georgescu, Mazdak Arabi, and Sarah Millonig, as well as the time, generosity, and access shared with us by managers of the establishments where data were collected in Tempe, Arizona. We would also like to thank Haven Guyer for her help and two anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments in strengthening the current paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, ISB.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Thermal comfort is an important determinant of quality of life and economic vitality in cities. Strategies to improve thermal comfort may become a more critical part of urban sustainability efforts with projections of continued urban growth and climate change. A case study was performed in the hot, dry summertime climate of Tempe, Arizona to quantify the influence of evaporative misters on the thermal environment in outdoor restaurants and to understand business managers’ motivations to use misters. Microclimate measurements (air temperature (Ta), wind speed, relative humidity, globe temperature) were taken at five restaurants midday within four exposures: misted sun, misted shade, sun only, and shade only. We assessed Ta, mean radiant temperature (MRT), universal thermal climate index (UTCI), and physiological equivalent temperature (PET) between these four conditions within each location. Misters improved thermal comfort across all days, sites, and exposure conditions. MRT was on average 7.6 °C lower in misted locations, which significantly lowered average PET (– 6.5 °C) and UTCI (– 4.4 °C) (p < 0.05). Thermal comfort was most improved using mist in combination with shade. Under such conditions, PET and UTCI were reduced by 15.5 °C and 9.7 °C (p < 0.05), respectively. Business managers identified customer comfort and increased seating capacity as the principal factors for mister use. Esthetics of misters further encouraged use, while cost and environmental concerns were perceived to be less important. While this case study demonstrates value in outdoor misting in a hot, dry climate, additional work is needed to more fully evaluate tradeoffs between cost, water use, and comfort with continuing urban growth.
AB - Thermal comfort is an important determinant of quality of life and economic vitality in cities. Strategies to improve thermal comfort may become a more critical part of urban sustainability efforts with projections of continued urban growth and climate change. A case study was performed in the hot, dry summertime climate of Tempe, Arizona to quantify the influence of evaporative misters on the thermal environment in outdoor restaurants and to understand business managers’ motivations to use misters. Microclimate measurements (air temperature (Ta), wind speed, relative humidity, globe temperature) were taken at five restaurants midday within four exposures: misted sun, misted shade, sun only, and shade only. We assessed Ta, mean radiant temperature (MRT), universal thermal climate index (UTCI), and physiological equivalent temperature (PET) between these four conditions within each location. Misters improved thermal comfort across all days, sites, and exposure conditions. MRT was on average 7.6 °C lower in misted locations, which significantly lowered average PET (– 6.5 °C) and UTCI (– 4.4 °C) (p < 0.05). Thermal comfort was most improved using mist in combination with shade. Under such conditions, PET and UTCI were reduced by 15.5 °C and 9.7 °C (p < 0.05), respectively. Business managers identified customer comfort and increased seating capacity as the principal factors for mister use. Esthetics of misters further encouraged use, while cost and environmental concerns were perceived to be less important. While this case study demonstrates value in outdoor misting in a hot, dry climate, additional work is needed to more fully evaluate tradeoffs between cost, water use, and comfort with continuing urban growth.
KW - Evaporative cooling
KW - Extreme heat
KW - Mister
KW - Thermal comfort
KW - Urban climate
KW - Water
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096621684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096621684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00484-020-02056-y
DO - 10.1007/s00484-020-02056-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 33244662
AN - SCOPUS:85096621684
SN - 0020-7128
VL - 66
SP - 357
EP - 369
JO - International journal of biometeorology
JF - International journal of biometeorology
IS - 2
ER -