TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of bifacial module technologies with combined-accelerated stress testing
AU - Hacke, Peter
AU - Kumar, Akash
AU - Terwilliger, Kent
AU - Ndione, Paul
AU - Spataru, Sergiu
AU - Pavgi, Ashwini
AU - Choudhury, Kaushik Roy
AU - Tamizhmani, Govindasamy
N1 - Funding Information:
Greg Perrin of NREL is acknowledged for assistance with the equipment and Cécile Molto for review of the manuscript. This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), under award number DE‐EE‐0008565. Additional funding for this work was provided as part of the Durable Module Materials Consortium (DuraMAT), an Energy Materials Network Consortium funded under Agreement 32509 and PV Reliability R&D to Ensure a Scientific Basis of Qualifiation Test and Standards under agreement 38263 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, and Solar Energy Technologies Office (EERE, SETO). This work was authored in part by NREL, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC for the U.S. DOE under contract no. DE‐AC36‐08GO28308.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - In view of the increasing interest and market share of bifacial cells and modules, suitable substrates such as glass and transparent backsheets along with ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyolefin elastomer (POE) encapsulants were examined in combined-accelerated stress testing (C-AST) to evaluate and compare degradation modes. Testing with both monofacial and bifacial cells, we found that glass–glass modules with monofacial cells led to greater grid finger breakage than those with polymeric backsheets. This is attributed to previous X-ray topography and modeling work showing higher stress in cells and interconnections in glass–glass modules than glass backsheet modules. Consistent with the objectives of C-AST, which stresses modules at levels corresponding to the limits seen in the natural environment, we observed the UV-fluorescence signatures of modules tested in C-AST (considering the degradation associated with developing chromophores, moisture penetration, and photobleaching effects) to be like those in fielded modules, more so than other chamber stress testing implemented for comparison. We found light-induced degradation (LID) in module types with regenerated (inactive) cells with C-AST, suggesting the possibility of LID destabilization in some field conditions. We could also distinguish potential-induced degradation (PID) on the back of the bifacial passivated emitter and rear cells (PERC) in C-AST. Confirming with ex situ tests, we found polarization-type PID most prevalent in glass-glass modules with EVA as would be anticipated considering the greater leakage current through such module encapsulation. Unlike PID tests performed in the dark, which can lead to false positive PID test results, field-representative illumination is experienced by the modules on the front and back sides while −1200 V system voltage is applied in C-AST, supporting the conclusion that this module type with glass-glass construction would be susceptible to PID in the field.
AB - In view of the increasing interest and market share of bifacial cells and modules, suitable substrates such as glass and transparent backsheets along with ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyolefin elastomer (POE) encapsulants were examined in combined-accelerated stress testing (C-AST) to evaluate and compare degradation modes. Testing with both monofacial and bifacial cells, we found that glass–glass modules with monofacial cells led to greater grid finger breakage than those with polymeric backsheets. This is attributed to previous X-ray topography and modeling work showing higher stress in cells and interconnections in glass–glass modules than glass backsheet modules. Consistent with the objectives of C-AST, which stresses modules at levels corresponding to the limits seen in the natural environment, we observed the UV-fluorescence signatures of modules tested in C-AST (considering the degradation associated with developing chromophores, moisture penetration, and photobleaching effects) to be like those in fielded modules, more so than other chamber stress testing implemented for comparison. We found light-induced degradation (LID) in module types with regenerated (inactive) cells with C-AST, suggesting the possibility of LID destabilization in some field conditions. We could also distinguish potential-induced degradation (PID) on the back of the bifacial passivated emitter and rear cells (PERC) in C-AST. Confirming with ex situ tests, we found polarization-type PID most prevalent in glass-glass modules with EVA as would be anticipated considering the greater leakage current through such module encapsulation. Unlike PID tests performed in the dark, which can lead to false positive PID test results, field-representative illumination is experienced by the modules on the front and back sides while −1200 V system voltage is applied in C-AST, supporting the conclusion that this module type with glass-glass construction would be susceptible to PID in the field.
KW - bifacial
KW - combined-accelerated stress testing
KW - degradation
KW - light-induced degradation
KW - photovoltaic modules
KW - potential-induced degradation
KW - reliability
KW - silicon solar cells
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141344813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85141344813&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pip.3636
DO - 10.1002/pip.3636
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85141344813
SN - 1062-7995
JO - Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
JF - Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications
ER -