Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index

Jeffrey R. Lacasse; David Hodge; Kristen F. Bean

doi:10.1177/1049731511405069

Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index

Jeffrey R. Lacasse, David Hodge, Kristen F. Bean

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

42 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: This article reports the first estimated h-index values for social work faculty. Methods: Multiple raters blindly assessed two samples of faculty (1) tenure-track faculty at institutions listed in theU.S.News andWorld Report top 10 (n=337) and (2) tenuretrack editorial board members of 5 highly ranked socialwork journals (n=215). Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients for h-index values among the multiple raters ranged from .83 to .92, indicating good reliability. For faculty at top 10 institutions, mean estimated h-index values were 3.97 (SD= 2.87) for assistant professors; 8.59 (SD= 3.72) for associate professors; and 16.14 (SD= 8.35) for full professors. Values for editorial board members were generally similar. Conclusions: These are the first such published data; further research is needed.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	599-607
Number of pages	9
Journal	Research on Social Work Practice
Volume	21
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511405069
State	Published - Sep 2011

Keywords

bibliometrics
evidence-based practice
quantitative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Sociology and Political Science
Psychology(all)

Access to Document

10.1177/1049731511405069

Cite this

@article{8b0e24926e9441b4bff603f67cd29658,

title = "Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index",

abstract = "Objectives: This article reports the first estimated h-index values for social work faculty. Methods: Multiple raters blindly assessed two samples of faculty (1) tenure-track faculty at institutions listed in theU.S.News andWorld Report top 10 (n=337) and (2) tenuretrack editorial board members of 5 highly ranked socialwork journals (n=215). Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients for h-index values among the multiple raters ranged from .83 to .92, indicating good reliability. For faculty at top 10 institutions, mean estimated h-index values were 3.97 (SD= 2.87) for assistant professors; 8.59 (SD= 3.72) for associate professors; and 16.14 (SD= 8.35) for full professors. Values for editorial board members were generally similar. Conclusions: These are the first such published data; further research is needed.",

keywords = "bibliometrics, evidence-based practice, quantitative",

author = "Lacasse, {Jeffrey R.} and David Hodge and Bean, {Kristen F.}",

year = "2011",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1177/1049731511405069",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "21",

pages = "599--607",

journal = "Research on Social Work Practice",

issn = "1049-7315",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index

AU - Lacasse, Jeffrey R.

AU - Hodge, David

AU - Bean, Kristen F.

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Objectives: This article reports the first estimated h-index values for social work faculty. Methods: Multiple raters blindly assessed two samples of faculty (1) tenure-track faculty at institutions listed in theU.S.News andWorld Report top 10 (n=337) and (2) tenuretrack editorial board members of 5 highly ranked socialwork journals (n=215). Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients for h-index values among the multiple raters ranged from .83 to .92, indicating good reliability. For faculty at top 10 institutions, mean estimated h-index values were 3.97 (SD= 2.87) for assistant professors; 8.59 (SD= 3.72) for associate professors; and 16.14 (SD= 8.35) for full professors. Values for editorial board members were generally similar. Conclusions: These are the first such published data; further research is needed.

AB - Objectives: This article reports the first estimated h-index values for social work faculty. Methods: Multiple raters blindly assessed two samples of faculty (1) tenure-track faculty at institutions listed in theU.S.News andWorld Report top 10 (n=337) and (2) tenuretrack editorial board members of 5 highly ranked socialwork journals (n=215). Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients for h-index values among the multiple raters ranged from .83 to .92, indicating good reliability. For faculty at top 10 institutions, mean estimated h-index values were 3.97 (SD= 2.87) for assistant professors; 8.59 (SD= 3.72) for associate professors; and 16.14 (SD= 8.35) for full professors. Values for editorial board members were generally similar. Conclusions: These are the first such published data; further research is needed.

KW - bibliometrics

KW - evidence-based practice

KW - quantitative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961154076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961154076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1049731511405069

DO - 10.1177/1049731511405069

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79961154076

SN - 1049-7315

VL - 21

SP - 599

EP - 607

JO - Research on Social Work Practice

JF - Research on Social Work Practice

IS - 5

ER -

Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this