Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index

Jeffrey R. Lacasse, David Hodge, Kristen F. Bean

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    42 Scopus citations


    Objectives: This article reports the first estimated h-index values for social work faculty. Methods: Multiple raters blindly assessed two samples of faculty (1) tenure-track faculty at institutions listed in theU.S.News andWorld Report top 10 (n=337) and (2) tenuretrack editorial board members of 5 highly ranked socialwork journals (n=215). Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients for h-index values among the multiple raters ranged from .83 to .92, indicating good reliability. For faculty at top 10 institutions, mean estimated h-index values were 3.97 (SD= 2.87) for assistant professors; 8.59 (SD= 3.72) for associate professors; and 16.14 (SD= 8.35) for full professors. Values for editorial board members were generally similar. Conclusions: These are the first such published data; further research is needed.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)599-607
    Number of pages9
    JournalResearch on Social Work Practice
    Issue number5
    StatePublished - Sep 2011


    • bibliometrics
    • evidence-based practice
    • quantitative

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Psychology(all)


    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this