Eusociality: Origin and consequences

Edward O. Wilson, Berthold Hoelldobler

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

500 Scopus citations


In this new assessment of the empirical evidence, an alternative to the standard model is proposed: group selection is the strong binding force in eusocial evolution; individual selection, the strong dissolutive force; and kin selection (narrowly defined), either a weak binding or weak dissolutive force, according to circumstance. Close kinship may be more a consequence of eusociality than a factor promoting its origin. A point of no return to the solitary state exists, as a rule when workers become anatomically differentiated. Eusociality has been rare in evolution, evidently due to the scarcity of environmental pressures adequate to tip the balance among countervailing forces in favor of group selection. Eusociality in ants and termites in the irreversible stage is the key to their ecological dominance and has (at least in ants) shaped some features of internal phytogeny. Their colonies are consistently superior to solitary and preeusocial competitors, due to the altruistic behavior among nastmates and their ability to organize coordinated action by pheromonal communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)13367-13371
Number of pages5
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Issue number38
StatePublished - Sep 20 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General


Dive into the research topics of 'Eusociality: Origin and consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this