TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups
T2 - Incentives, Barriers, and Potential
AU - Boucher, J. L.
AU - Levenda, A. M.
AU - Morales-Guerrero, J.
AU - Macias, M. M.
AU - Karwat, D. M.A.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank our publication reviewers for their support and guidance. We want to thank all of those who participated in our survey. Part of this research was conducted with the support of National Science Foundation Award 2016108.
Funding Information:
Knowledge sharing can also happen through other institutional mechanisms. For example, funding organizations like the U.S. NSF and U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), organizations that have funded community‐based science and engineering (see, e.g., the program by the NSF, 2016 , and the of the NIH, 2018 ) can make it easier for researchers interested in such work by synthesizing modes of engagement used across their funded grants and point new researchers to ways in which others have incorporated community‐based collaborations in their work. This can make it easier for researchers to build from existing knowledge and practice, rather than first‐time learning and possibly failing at their goals. Smart and Connected Communities Community‐based Participatory Research Program
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020. The Authors.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - With the aim of mobilizing engineers and scientists to address environmental, climate, and energy justice challenges in the United States, this study examines how engineers and scientists view their incentives, barriers, and potential for community-based collaborations. Through a purposive convenience sample (n = 281) and an online questionnaire, we investigate the attitudes and experiences of engineers and scientists regarding their community-based work. Our analyses reveal dynamics of race, class, and experience, suggesting a type of socio-demographic conditioning informing community-based collaborations. Engineers and scientists also identify four main barriers to community-based work: lack of time, lack of funding, lack of rapport, and knowledge deficits. In response, we introduce a field of collaboration with its own set of capitals—economic, cultural, social, and symbolic—and offer recommendations on how engineers, scientists, and community groups might collaborate with each other to address longstanding issues of energy, climate, and environmental injustice in the United States.
AB - With the aim of mobilizing engineers and scientists to address environmental, climate, and energy justice challenges in the United States, this study examines how engineers and scientists view their incentives, barriers, and potential for community-based collaborations. Through a purposive convenience sample (n = 281) and an online questionnaire, we investigate the attitudes and experiences of engineers and scientists regarding their community-based work. Our analyses reveal dynamics of race, class, and experience, suggesting a type of socio-demographic conditioning informing community-based collaborations. Engineers and scientists also identify four main barriers to community-based work: lack of time, lack of funding, lack of rapport, and knowledge deficits. In response, we introduce a field of collaboration with its own set of capitals—economic, cultural, social, and symbolic—and offer recommendations on how engineers, scientists, and community groups might collaborate with each other to address longstanding issues of energy, climate, and environmental injustice in the United States.
KW - community-based engineering and science
KW - environmental, climate, and energy justice
KW - field of collaboration
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093830063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85093830063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2020EF001624
DO - 10.1029/2020EF001624
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85093830063
SN - 2328-4277
VL - 8
JO - Earth's Future
JF - Earth's Future
IS - 10
M1 - e2020EF001624
ER -