Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Arizona State University Home
Home
Profiles
Departments and Centers
Scholarly Works
Activities
Equipment
Grants
Datasets
Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Engaging whom and for what ends? Australian stakeholders' constructions of public engagement in relation to nanotechnologies
Alan Petersen,
Diana Bowman
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
11
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Engaging whom and for what ends? Australian stakeholders' constructions of public engagement in relation to nanotechnologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Arts & Humanities
Public Engagement
100%
Nanotechnology
80%
Discourse
30%
Citizen Participation
24%
Democratization
20%
Ignorance
18%
Conceptual Framework
16%
Positioning
15%
Policy Making
15%
Citizenship
14%
Language
14%
Conception
9%
Earth & Environmental Sciences
nanotechnology
76%
stakeholder
52%
public
43%
science
21%
democratization
12%
citizenship
12%
conceptual framework
8%
science and technology
8%
citizen
7%
positioning
7%
participation
7%
society
6%
Europe
5%
policy
4%
comparison
3%
Agriculture & Biology
nanotechnology
80%
stakeholders
72%
citizen participation
44%
United Kingdom
22%
Social Sciences
nanotechnology
72%
stakeholder
45%
citizens' participation
14%
discourse
14%
lack
13%
democratization
12%
deficit
10%
citizenship
10%
event
7%
experience
4%