TY - GEN
T1 - Efficacy of peer review network structures
T2 - 2016 International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2016
AU - Stevens, Scott
AU - Waters, Andrew
AU - Babik, Dmytro
AU - Tinapple, David
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by NSF grant # 1431856.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - IT-enabled peer-based creation, review, and evaluation systems are widely spread in multiple areas of open innovation and knowledge management. Despite a noticeable variety of designs, particularly, in the structure of peer networks (that is, how participants are linked to each other as creators and reviewers), these design choices are hardly ever grounded in design research. Characteristics of peer network structure, such as reciprocity and clustering, may affect how well such systems reveal participants' competencies and their products' qualities. Designing peer review systems that produce valid and reliable evaluations is, therefore, among the most fundamental concerns. Using a simulation approach, we show that reciprocity and clustering indeed have an effect, but its direction and magnitude depend on the evaluation scale used. So far, we have found no evidence that transitional networks have superior efficacy in comparison with "pure" networks. We outlined directions for further investigation.
AB - IT-enabled peer-based creation, review, and evaluation systems are widely spread in multiple areas of open innovation and knowledge management. Despite a noticeable variety of designs, particularly, in the structure of peer networks (that is, how participants are linked to each other as creators and reviewers), these design choices are hardly ever grounded in design research. Characteristics of peer network structure, such as reciprocity and clustering, may affect how well such systems reveal participants' competencies and their products' qualities. Designing peer review systems that produce valid and reliable evaluations is, therefore, among the most fundamental concerns. Using a simulation approach, we show that reciprocity and clustering indeed have an effect, but its direction and magnitude depend on the evaluation scale used. So far, we have found no evidence that transitional networks have superior efficacy in comparison with "pure" networks. We outlined directions for further investigation.
KW - Clustering
KW - Evaluation systems
KW - Information quality
KW - Knowledge artifacts
KW - Network structures
KW - Peer review
KW - Reciprocity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019501155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019501155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85019501155
T3 - 2016 International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2016
BT - 2016 International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2016
PB - Association for Information Systems
Y2 - 11 December 2016 through 14 December 2016
ER -