TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of gradual and sudden introduction of perturbations on adaptive responses to formant-shift and formant-clamp perturbations
AU - Chaoa, Sara Ching
AU - Daliria, Ayoub
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/5
Y1 - 2023/5
N2 - Purpose: When the speech motor system encounters errors, it generates adaptive responses to compensate for the errors. Unlike errors induced by formantshift perturbations, errors induced by formant-clamp perturbations do not correspond with the speaker’s speech (i.e., degraded motor-to-auditory correspondence). We previously showed that adaptive responses to formant-clamp perturbations are smaller than responses to formant-shift perturbations when perturbations are introduced gradually. This study examined responses to formant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations when perturbations are introduced suddenly. Method: One group of participants (n = 30) experienced gradually introduced formant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations, and another group (n = 30) experienced suddenly introduced foifnant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations. We designed the perturbations based on participant-specific vowel configurations such that a participant’s first and second formants of /ε/ were perturbed toward their /æ/. To estimate adaptive responses, we measured formant changes (0-100 ms of the vowel) in response to the formant perturbations. Results: We found that (a) the difference between responses to formant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations was smaller when the perturbations were introduced suddenly and (b) responses to suddenly introduced (but not gradually introduced) formant-shift perturbations positively correlated with responses to formant-clamp perturbations. Conclusions: These results showed that the speech motor system responds to errors induced by formant-shift and formant-clamp perturbations more differently when perturbations are introduced gradually than suddenly. Overall, the quality of errors (formant-shift vs. formant-clamp) and the manner of introducing errors (gradually vs. suddenly) modulate the speech motor system’s evaluations of and responses to errors. Supplemental Material: Https://doi.org/1023641/asha.22406422
AB - Purpose: When the speech motor system encounters errors, it generates adaptive responses to compensate for the errors. Unlike errors induced by formantshift perturbations, errors induced by formant-clamp perturbations do not correspond with the speaker’s speech (i.e., degraded motor-to-auditory correspondence). We previously showed that adaptive responses to formant-clamp perturbations are smaller than responses to formant-shift perturbations when perturbations are introduced gradually. This study examined responses to formant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations when perturbations are introduced suddenly. Method: One group of participants (n = 30) experienced gradually introduced formant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations, and another group (n = 30) experienced suddenly introduced foifnant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations. We designed the perturbations based on participant-specific vowel configurations such that a participant’s first and second formants of /ε/ were perturbed toward their /æ/. To estimate adaptive responses, we measured formant changes (0-100 ms of the vowel) in response to the formant perturbations. Results: We found that (a) the difference between responses to formant-clamp and formant-shift perturbations was smaller when the perturbations were introduced suddenly and (b) responses to suddenly introduced (but not gradually introduced) formant-shift perturbations positively correlated with responses to formant-clamp perturbations. Conclusions: These results showed that the speech motor system responds to errors induced by formant-shift and formant-clamp perturbations more differently when perturbations are introduced gradually than suddenly. Overall, the quality of errors (formant-shift vs. formant-clamp) and the manner of introducing errors (gradually vs. suddenly) modulate the speech motor system’s evaluations of and responses to errors. Supplemental Material: Https://doi.org/1023641/asha.22406422
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159727740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85159727740&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-21-00435
DO - 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-21-00435
M3 - Article
C2 - 37059081
AN - SCOPUS:85159727740
SN - 1092-4388
VL - 66
SP - 1588
EP - 1599
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
IS - 5
ER -